Patrick Brooks v. Pinnacle Financial Corporation et al
Filing
94
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Plaintiff shall recover nothing and that this action this case is dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — WESTERN DIVISION
9
10
11 Patrick Brooks,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff,
vs.
Pinnacle Financial Corporation;
Mortgage Electronic Registration
Systems, Inc.; GMAC Mortgage, LLC;
Executive Trustee Services, LLC;
Executive Trustee Services, LLC dba
ETS Services LLC; ETS Services LLC;
Cindy Sandoval; Bank Of New York
Mellon Trust Company, National
Association; Residential Asset
Mortgage Products INC., Series 2006RS1 Trust; DCB United LLC;
Varougan Karapetian and Vincent
Karapetian; Nanette Karapetian; and
Does 1-12, Inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. LA CV16-07711 JAK (AJWx)
JUDGMENT
JS-6
1
The motions of Defendants MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
2 SYSTEMS, INC., BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY,
3 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, RESIDENTIAL ASSET MORTGAGE PRODUCTS
4 INC., SERIES 2006-RS1 TRUST, DCB UNITED LLC, VAROUGAN
5 KARAPETIAN, VINCENT KARAPETIAN, and NANETTE KARAPETIAN
6 (collectively, “Defendants”) to dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiff PATRICK
7 BROOKS (“Plaintiff”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for
8 failure to state a claim were granted with prejudice, and defendants GMAC
9 MORTGAGE, LLC, EXECUTIVE TRUSTEE SERVICES, LLC, and ETS
10 SERVICES, LLC were dismissed separately without objection by Plaintiff.
11 Therefore,
12
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
13 Plaintiff shall recover nothing and that this action this case is dismissed with
14 prejudice as to all defendants.
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17 Dated: December 1, 2017:
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?