United States of America v. Mi H. Teel

Filing 14

DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Clerk of Court, in favor of United States of America against Mi H Teel in the principal amount of $2,128.80, interest in the amount of $2,687.35, attorneys fees of $412.88, costs of $480.50 for a total judgment of $5,709.53. Related to: First REQUEST for Default Judgment against defendant Mi H. Teel aka Mi Hwa Teel 11 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)

Download PDF
4 JACQUELYNE M. NGUYEN, Bar no. 249658 LAW OFFICES OF JACQUELYNE M. NGUYEN 2900 BRISTOL STREET, SUITE A-208 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Telephone: (949) 722-0055 Fax: (949) 722-8416 Email: jackie@jacquelynenguyenlaw.com 5 Attorney for: Plaintiff 1 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No.: 2:16-cv-7741 GW (MRWx) vs. DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY CLERK MI H. TEEL, AKA MI HWA TEEL, 15 Defendant 16 17 In the above-entitled action, the Clerk of this Court 18 entered a default against Defendant Mi H. Teel, aka Mi Hwa Teel 19 for failure to respond or appear, satisfying the requirements of 20 Rule 55. 21 IT IS ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, United States of America, 22 shall have and recover from Defendant, Mi H. Teel, aka Mi Hwa 23 Teel the sum of $2,128.80 in principal, $2,687.35 in accrued pre- 24 judgment interest through January 9, 2017, with interest accruing 25 from January 9, 2017, at 8% annually until entry of judgment, 26 plus $480.50 as costs and $412.88 for attorney fee, pursuant to 27 Central District Local Rule 55.4, for a total of 28 /// $5,709.53. This Judgment is to accrue interest at the legal rate from the date of entry until paid. -1- Kiry K. Gray Clerk of the Court United States District Court 1 2 3 4 DATED: 1/10/2017 By:_________________________ _________ _______________ __ __ Margo Mead, Deputy Clerk 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?