Michael Craig Myers v. Warden

Filing 14

Summarily Dismissing Action Without Prejudice by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: (see attached) Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3(a), the Court refers the petition to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for consideration as an applicat ion for leave to file a second-or-successive habeas petition. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (Form 12 and copy of petition attached) (appeals cc'd) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Form 12, # 2 copy of petition) (jm)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 58 Page ID #:1 r +~ A ~A Y .C~ ~.~~iL CLERK U.S DISTRICT COURT PRISON IDEi\'fIFIC~TION/BOOKING NO. ~ ~zl~t~ DCT ! 8 201~6j C= t ~~~`` ADDRESS OR PLACE OF CONFINEh1ENT C ~~• ~~ , CJ C~ ~ Note: T lSTRJCI OF CPLIFORNIA DEPUTY ~P I) ~~ It is your responsibility to notify the Clerk of Court in writing of any change of address. If represented h}' an atturne}'~ provide his name, address, telephone and facsimile numbers, and e-~nai] address. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NUMBER: C~ ~ ~7 ~ l~ ~° i i~ a E ~ e f~ ~a i C- ~~ Y ,~ S FULL NAME (Lnclu~te name under w]ticli yoir tivere convicted 1b be supplied by the Clerk of[he United States District Court Petitioner, v. AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY 28 L.S.C. 4 225 NAME OI= WARDEN,SUPERINTENDENT,JAILOR OR AU'THORI"LED PF,RSON H~V'ING CUSTODY OF PETII~IONER Respondent. ! . PLACE/CO~'NTY OF CONVIC1~lON ~ ~ ~ ~ [iy1 ,- ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ PREVIOUSLY FILED, RELATED CASES lti THIS D15"I'RICT COURT ( List by cage rn~mber) C~~ ~ L' , INSTRUCTIONS -PLEASE READ CAREFULLY 1. "1'0 rise this form, you mist be a persai ~vho either is currently serving a sentence ~mder a judgment against you iii a California state court, or will be ser~~ng a sentence ui the future under a ji~dgirient against you in a CaliYornia state court. You are aslang for relief from t}ie conviction and%or the sentence. This form is~~our E~etition for relief. 2. In this petition, you may challenbe die judgment entered by'only one California state courC. If yoti watt to challenge die judgment entered by a different California state court,j~ou must file a separate petition. 3 Male sure the form is typed or neatly handwritten. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of . a material fact, you mays be prosecuted for perjury. ~. ,answer all the questions. ]"ou do not need to cite case l~nv, but you do need to state die federal legal theory and operative facts in support of each grotuid. You ma~~ submit additional pages if necessary. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or correct inforniation. If}'ou want to submit a legal brief or arguments, you may attach a separate memorandum. t11e grounds for relieY fi-on1 the convictio~i aild/or sentence that you challenge. ti. ~"ou must inilude in this petition all the grounds for relief from the conviction and/or sentence that you challenge. And you must state the fists that support eadl gro~uld. If you tail to set forth all die grounds in this petition, you may be ban~ed from presenting additional grounds at a later date. 6. You must pay a fee of $s.00. If the fee is paid,}your petition will be filed. If}-ou cannot afford the fee, you ma~~ ask to proceed rr~fo~-~f~a pnup~ris(as a poor person). To do that, you must fill out and sign the declaration of the last two pages oFt11e form. Also, you m ust have an audloi-ized officer at the pencil institution complete the certificate as to die amount of money and securities oi~ deposit to your credit in any account at tl~e institution. If your prison account exceeds ?5.00, you must pay the filii g ter. LODGED C~-~K U.~. DIST4~iCT CpURT 7• ~'heii }'ou Dave completed tl~e form, se~id the original and tEvo copies to dle following address: Clerk of t(le United States District Cotu-C for the Central District of California United States Courthouse ~ ~, 1 ~ 7 2~~6 ATTN: Lital:e/Docket Section ~~'' 312 North Siring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 AL Dim ~ H~i'T (~F CF~LIFORN DEPU~ -69(OSi12) PETITION U.S.0 9 Page 1 m Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 2 of 58 Page ID #:2 PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING:(Check appropr•inte niir~~l~er) This petition concerns: 1. [~ a conviction and/or sentence. 2. ❑prison discipline. 3. u a parole problem. 4. ❑other. PETITION ` ''CIlLL~ a. Place of detelrtioil ~ ~ ~ G 1✓'~ !~' b. Place of conviction and sentence ~. J ~~~ ~ ~~'1 ~j~7 y~ ,,~} ~ ~ "~ J ~ ~ p'~ ~/` j('j j~ (_[~~~^ ~ C011V]CllOil Ol7 WI11C?] illE ]J2CLU011 IS 1J~S2C~ (a separate petition must befiledfin end~i conviction tieing atrncked)_ il. ~aCLil'e Of Otferi52S 111VO1VeC~ (include all counts): ~ `~ ~ ~vSS~s~TG~~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~~ ~f ~ ~IR~~~t~ b. Penal or other code section or sections: ~. c~s~ ~~«~~~ve~-: ~ ~i ~~~~_~, ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~~~ i~ ~i r~ a ~12 ~3 ;t d. Date of conviction: ' ~ ~' ~(~, ~ ~ ~l e. Date of sente~lce: F . Lei7gth of sentence oil each count: ~ ~ ~"~ Q• ` ~ ~ Z ~j — (`~ ~( (~, ~ ~; P1c:H (check aie): Not guilty u Guilty u Nolo contei~dere ~l. I~lI]C~ Of 11"I<ll (dieckone) ~ JLIC~~ u JUC~~e O17Iy' 3 Did yogi appeal tin the California Court of Appeal from the judgi7ient of conviction? . [' Yes To If SU, ~1VC ti1E t0~101h'lllb 111f~0I'117aLIOR f01 VOL1T ~~peal (and nttadi a copy of tl~e Courto(Ap~enl decision ifnvailable): a. Case i~timber: ~ ,~ ~ ,J ~~ ~ ~~ ~. ~1"OltllC~s T~liseC{ (listcacl7): ~ 1~ ~ ~~ CV-G9 (OS/1') PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON INSTATE CUSTODY(28 U.S.0 9 2254) YaQe 2 of 11 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 3 of 58 Page ID #:3 (~) (~) (5) (F) c. Date of decision: d. Result 4 If ~rou did appeal, did ~rou also Yile a Petition for Revie~~v with the California Supreme Court of the Court of Appeal . decision? u No u Yes If SO ~]Ve tale fOIlO~Vlll~ lllfOrlll~tlOri (rmd attach copies ofthe Petitio~i for Renew grid tl~e Supre»ie Court ruling if m~aifnhle) ~. C~lSe Illllllbfl": ~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 ~~ ~ S ~ ~ lJ ~ ~~ I b. Grounds raised~<<sre~~~,): (1) (_') ~-~) ~~) ~~) ( 6) c. Date ofdecision: d. Res«1t If you did not appeal: a. State your reasons p~ V G e tJ Y✓~ ~'~l fi ~ ~' ~1 ~ i~L~ ~~ ~, ~ /~ ~~ C-~~~{~' ~ ~) is b G'►? 1 't~' ~ ~~' ~'Zr~i~f%1i~ ~/~ ~i~ ~ ~~ ~ -+- L U f,.~ N" ~, t~' ~ ~~1 r3 t7 ~~ i ~` ~ i i~ ~tr~ ~ rr ~ Y (~ ~ ~F~~ ~ ~ .f'v ~n i/ ~ S ` E ~ f~ t ~ . ~ 1~ c~ ~ ~ ~~ 1~ ~ ~ e ~4u' ~ ~~ ~y, ~ 1~Q c u ~ ~ ~~ fi ~' p~~~ r~ r~ wr~r~~-~ ~~a I ~ ~ e ~J ~ n a r 1~r, e~-? "f ~, i1~ c'_ i.~1 r ~ i d e ~► c~ c: . b. Did you seek permission to file a late appeal? ❑Yes [/]'~To C. Have you previously filed any habeas petitions in any state court with respect to this judgment of conviction? u Yes C~~;v I~ SO, a1Ve 112 ~~OIlO~V1I]g ll1f01"II78CLOIl f01 EaCll SUC~1 ~7EC1f10II (i~se additional pages if accessory, a~~d attach copies of tF~e petitions and the ruli~eg< on the petitions if avniln6le): a. (1) Naine of court: ( Case number: 2) 3~ ~3Ce f11EC~ (or if mnileri, the date lh~ petition ivas turned n~~e-r to dee prism audToritiesJor nuxiling): CV-(i9 (0>/1?) PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BF A PERSON 1N S'rATE CUSTODY(28 U.S.0 4 2254) Page 3 of 11 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 4 of 58 Page ID #:4 (~) Grounds raised(us<<ud~~: _ ~a) ~v) ~~) ~~) (e) ~~ ( Date of decision: 5) ( Result 6) (7) Vas an eaidentiary hearing held? u Yes No U. (1) Name of courC ( Case munber: 2) 3~ date f11eC~ (or iJ rrmileA, the dote the petition wru horned o~~er l'o the prison nuthnritiesjor mailing) ( Grounds raised (~t;c ~~:d~i: 4) ( a) ~v) (c) ~d~ (e) ( ~ ( Date of decision: 5) ( Restitlt 6) ( Was an evidentiary hearing held? '} u I'es ~No c. (1) Name of court ( Case number: 2) ~3~ ~~lCe t112C~ (or if mnilecl, the dote the peeition ivas turned orer to thr prison a~itNioritiesJor maili~ngj: ( Grounds raised p;sr~~,~~,~: ~) ~~i) ~~~ ~~) ~~{~ (~) (t~ CV-G9 (0~/ l'_) PET'iTION FOR Y~'RIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY(28 U.S.0 9 2254) Page 4 of 11 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 5 of 58 Page ID #:5 (5) Date of decision: (6) Res«lt ( ~~Vas an evidentiary hearing held? 7) 7. u ~es[~No L~ 1'es Did }'o~i file a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court? u No Ii yes, answer the following: (1) Docket or case number (if you luiow): ~ C~ , I ,ij r I~ ~G►U (,~~ (2) Pesult (3) Date of result (if you know): (4) Citation to the case (if you know): 8. For this petition, state every ground on which you claim that vo~i are being held in violation of the Constitution, la~~~s, or treaties of the United States. Attach additional pages if you have more than five grounds. Summarize briefly the facts supparting each ground. For example, if you are claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, you must state facts specifically setting forth what your attorney did or failed to do. CAUTION: a. Exha~~stion RegcairerrienC: In order to proceed in federal court, you must ordinarily first e~chaust yotu~ state court remedies with respect to each ground on which you are requesting relief from the federal court. This means that, prior to seeking relief from the federal court, you first must present all of your grounds to the California Supreme Court. Urotuld one: (1) Supporting FACTS: (2) Did you raise this claim on direct appeal to the California Court of Appeal? L~No (3) Did you raise this claim in a Petition for Review to the California Supreme Court? u Yes ~No (4) Did }you raise this claim in a habeas petition to the California Supreme Court? b. u Yes ~ es ~~Qo Ground two: (1) Supporting FACTS: CV-G9 (U5/1') PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY (28 U.S.0 4 2254) Page 5 of 11 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 6 of 58 Page ID #:6 (2) Did you raise this claim on direct appeal to the California Court of Appeal? [I~No (3) Did you raise this claim in a Petition for Review to the California Supreme Court? ❑Yes [~To (4) Did you raise this claim in a habeas petition to the California Supreme Court? ❑Yes L~No (2) Did you raise this claim on direct appeal to the California Court of Appeal? ❑Yes ~No ( Did you raise this claim in a Petition for Review to the California Supreme Court? 3) ❑Yes ~o (4)Did you raise this claim in a habeas petition to the California Supreme Court? u1es ~o ( Did you raise this claim on direct appeal to the California Cotu-t of Appeal? 2) ❑Yes ~No (3) Did ~°ou raise this claim in a Petition for Review to the California Supreme Court? ❑Yes ~No ( Did }you raise this claim in a habeas petition to the California Supreme Court? ~) c. u 1'es ❑Yes [✓~No ❑Yes [G~No Ground three: (1) Supporting FACTS: d. Ground four: (1) Supporting PACTS: e. Gro~ind five: (1) SLipportingFACTS: (2) Did you raise this claim on direct appeal to the California Court of Appeal? CV-69 (OS/ l2) PETITION FOR N'RIT OF HABEAS CORPUS B]A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY(28 U.S.0 4 2254) Page 6 of 11 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 7 of 58 Page ID #:7 (3) Did you raise this claim in a Petition for Review to the California Supreme Court? u ~'2S ~O ( Did you raise this claim in a habeas petition to the California Supreme Court? ~) u Yes [~°l~To 9. It any of the grounds Iisted in paragraph 7 were not previously presented to the California Supreme Court, state briefly- which grounds ~~~ere not presented, and give your reasons: lU. Have you previously filed any habeas petitions in any federal co~u-t with respect to this judgment of conviction? u Yes ~ To If 50, ~1Ve t112 tO110~~V1IIg 111tO11Ilat10R fOI e1C11 SUCIl ~72~1t7011 (arse addif~iorialpa~es if necessary, aril attnch copies of dzepatitiorisand the ru[i~~~gs on the petitio~is ijar~xilaGle): a. (1) Name of court: ( Case nu~Ilber: 2) ~,i~ ~~te f11eC~ (or rfrnuiLed, the date tl~e petitran wns turned oi~er to the prison aut~liorit'ies for mniling): ~) ( Grounds raised ~usc ~~~,~~~1: ~1 ) ~ h) (~) ~~~) ( e) (1) (5) Date of decision: ( Result 6) (7) Vas aii evidentiary hearing held? u ~'es ~No U. (1) Name of court: ( Case member: 2) ~.i~ ~a[e ~1jeC~ (or if rnailed, the date dic petilio~i ie•ns tarried over to the prison authoritiesfor mailing): ( GLotlnCls 1'<lise(~ (list each): 4) ~a) - ~U) (c) ( d) (e) ~~ ( Date of decision: 5) CV-G9 (0,/12) PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY (28 U.S.0 9 2254) Page 7 of 11 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 8 of 58 Page ID #:8 (6) P.esult (7) Was an evidentiary hearing held? ❑Yes I~To 11. Do you have any petitions now ~~endvlg (i.e., filed but not vet decided) in any state or federal court with respect to this judgment of conviction? [lam 1'es ❑Nn If SO, gl~'t the f01106~'lI]F 1rifOrTT1~t10t] (and ntfnch n ropy offhe~etitiorr ifnvailnble): (1) Name of court: ( Case number: 2) ~ ~~ 2 ,'~Z~7r7 ~~1 ;~ f?3~ f i `~ I.J ~ a ~1^ J G I ((JiJ3s'" l ~ (. ~ t71~ ~'/l~~ i~ ~AtE f11eC1 (or ifrncailed, t0ie doea die petition tivn, lzrrned oi~er In the prison authorities for moiling): (4) Grounds raised ~~t~r e«~h): ( a) ( b) (c) ( d) ( e) (t) Yes ❑No 12. Are you presently represented b}counsel? 1f so, provide name, address and telephone number: ~U~ , (_~ ~~ y' ~ ~~ Z ~ ~ WHEREFORE, petitioner prays that' ~l~e Court grant petitioizer relief to which he maybe entitled in this proceeding, Signature ofnttor-~~iey (ifany) I declare (or certify, verll~y, or state) under pen~~lty of perj~uy that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed oii LV-G9 (OS/1') ~ ~ ~-- ~ ~ -~ "~~ ~~ Date '~' Signat~er ofPetitioner PETITION FOR ti1'RIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY (28 U.S.0 9 2254) Page 8 of 11 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 9 of 58 Page ID #:9 Petitioner DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Respondent(sJ I, tv( ~'~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' ~_ ,~ y ~~„ c~ ,declare that I am the petitioner in the above entitled case; that in support of my motion ro proceed without being required to prepay fees, costs or give security therefor, I state that bec~~use of my poverty I am ~lnable to pay the costs of said proceeding or to give security therefor; that I believe I am entitled to relief. 1. Are ~rou presently employed? I(/1 Yes u No a. If fl1e answer is yes, state the amount of your salary or wages per month, and give the name and address ofyour employer. ~, ~/ ~ ~ C~/` ~?(,'t1 b. I[-the answer is no, state the date of last employment and the an~o~u~t of the salary and wages per month which yotit received. 2. Ha~~e you received, ~,rithin the past twelve months, any money from any of the following sources? a. ~3usiness, profession ar form of self-employment? ❑Yes u No U. Rent payments, interest or dividends? u Y"es u No c. Pensions, a~i~itiities or life insurance payments? u ~'es u No d. Gifts or inheritances? ❑Yes u No e. u 1'es u No A~1v other sources? If the ans~-ver to an~~ of the abo~-e is yes, describe each source of money and state the amotult received from each d uring tl~e past twelve months: 3. Do ~~ou o~vn any cash, or do you have money in a checking or savings accounN. (Indi~de any fiuzds in prison accounts) u ~es CV-G9 (Oi/ 12) u No PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON INSTATE CUSTODY (28 U.S.0 4 2254) Page 10 vl 1 L Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 10 of 58 Page ID #:10 If the answer is ~~es, state the total value of the items owned: ~. Do you own any real estate, stocks, bonds, notes, automobiles, or other valuable property? (E.rcluding ordinary liousel2old furnis11ii2gs e~sz~ clnthiriQ) ❑Yes I1~LV0 If the ans~~~er is yes, describe the property and state its approximate value: ~. List the persons ~vho are dependent upon you for support, state your relationship to those persons, and indicate ho~v much yoti contribute to~n~ard their support: I, declare (or certify, verify or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on j~~' ~d .i ~~iJ~(l Dnte ~~~ ~ ~,~~~f 1~~ Signnt~ei~e of etitiorter ~' CERTIFICATE I herebn certily that the Petitioner herein has the suin of$ on account to his credit institution where he is at the confined. I fiirther certify that Petitioner lilce~vise has tl~e following securities to his credit according to the records of said 111StITllt1017: Date CV-(i9 (OS/ 12) Ai~+t}iorized Officer vfInstitution/Title of Officer PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY(28 U.S.0 9 ~~54) Page ll of 1 I Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 11 of 58 Page ID #:11 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 12 of 58 Page ID #:12 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 13 of 58 Page ID #:13 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 14 of 58 Page ID #:14 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 15 of 58 Page ID #:15 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 16 of 58 Page ID #:16 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 17 of 58 Page ID #:17 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 18 of 58 Page ID #:18 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 19 of 58 Page ID #:19 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 20 of 58 Page ID #:20 262 1 P OMONA, CALIFORNIA; WED., JANUARY 17, 1996; 1:45 P.M. 2 D EPARTMENT EAST O HON. WILLIAM J. MC VITTIE, JUDGE (APPEARANCES AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED.) 3 4 ( THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE HELD ' 5 6 I N OPEN COURT, OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE 7 O F THE JURY:) 8 M R. WHITENHILL: 9 10 YOUR HONOR, I AM GOING TO MAKE A RECORD WITH REQUESTS MY CLIENT IS MAKING. THE PEOPLE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO PRESENT 11 12 A COUPLE OF WITNESSES PRESENTED AT THE ORIGINAL 13 TRIAL. 14 TIME; DON SMITH, THE PAROLE OFFICER, AS WELL AS FRANK 15 TERRIO. HE'S ASKING THEY BE BROUGHT TO TRIAL AT THIS I DON'T NECESSARILY AGREE WITH MY 16 17 C LIENT ON THIS AND WOULD I EXERCISE MY RIGHT AS HIS 18 LEGAL COUNSEL TO DECIDE WHICH WITNESSES ARE GOING TO 19 B E BROUGHT. I BELIEVE DON SMITH WILL PROBABLY 20 21 ASSIST THE PEOPLE IN THE SENSE HE WAS THE AUTHORIZING 22 PAROLE OFFICER. 23 B ETTER LIGHT TO ARGUE THE PEOPLE DID N07 PROVE THEIR 24 CASE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT IF DON SMITH WAS NOT 25 H ERE. 26 T HE PEOPLE IN NOT BRINGING THIS PAROLE OFFICER HERE. 27 I F THEY DON'T WANT TO BRING HIM, IT'S BETTER FOR MY 28 P OSITION. I BELIEVE THE DEFENSE WOULD BE IN A SO AS A DEFENSE STRATEGY, I DON'T ARGUE WITH 9 `~ Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 21 of 58 Page ID #:21 263 I 1 MAKE WANT TO 2 MR. MYERS IS BETTER HERE AGAINST MY R EQUESTING MR. SMITH BE 3 THE RECORD W ISHES. SECOND WITNESS -- AS TO THE 9 THE COURT: 5 LET'S START WITH THAT. 6 7 HERE G OING TO ORDER PEOPLE IN I'M NOT WHEN YOU HAVE THE RIGHT T O SUBPOENA THEM. 8 9 T HE CORRECT. MR. WHITENHILL: COURT: YOUR CLIENT WANTS SO IF 10 H ERE, YOU HAVE THEM SUBPOENAED. 11 M R. WHITENHILL: THEM 12 IF I CHOOSE TO HAVE THEM H ERE. THE COURT: 13 THAT'S A MATTER OF YOUR YOU'RE THE 14 P ROFESSIONAL DISCRETION AND JUDGMENT. 15 LAWYER; YOU HAVE THE LICENSE. 16 CAN'T JUST BRING IN EVERYBODY HE WANTS 17 18 MR. WHITENHILL: R ECORD FOR I I TO HAVE HERE. MAKE THE JUST WANT TO FUTURE APPELLATE PURPOSES -- T HE. COURT: 20 INDEED HAVE. YOU 19 M R. WHITENHILL: 21 I RESPECT YOU. -- WHEN T HESE WITNESSES WERE NOT YOU HAVE. MY CLIENT COMPLAINS HERE. F RANK TERRIO IS AN.EXPERT AS TO 22 ONE OF THE CRUCIAL ISSUES IN 23 F INGERPRINTS. 29 I F MY CLIENT EVER HANDLED 25 TERRIO z~ ON 27 T ERI;''0 Pr'AS UNABLE TO ~8 ; A WEAPON. H+S IS GOING THAT POINT. THE WEAPON., TO ASSIST THE PEOPLE I READ DON'T THINK THE DEFENSE THE ORIGI;I~L TRAL TRANSCRIPT. MAKE Ai~JY IDENTIFIABLE TESTIMONY WAS LO UR I HERE IS THAI tiE CQULD PRINTS rJN NOT RULE Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 22 of 58 Page ID #:22 264 1 MY CLIENT OUT, WHICH IS MORE OF A NEGATIVE TO OUR 2 CASE. 3 ARGUE THE EVIDENCE HAS NOT BEEN PROVEN ADD THE PEOPLE 4 ARE LACKING IN THEIR CASE AGAIN. I THINK I WOULD BE IN A STRONGER LIGHT TO BASED ON MY STRATEGY, MY THEORY OF THE 5 6 CASE, I WOULD NOT CALL AIM, BUT FOR MY CLIENT'S 7 BENEFIT, T 8 APPELLATE PURP05ES. WANT THAT ON THE RECORD FOR FUTURE THE COURT: 9 WE WILL REFLECT MR. MYERS' 10 REQUEST THROUGh YOU, AND WE WILL REFLECT THE 11 RESPONSIVE ALREADY STATED ON THE RECORD. 12 MR. WHITENHILL: 13 THE COURT: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. YOU'RE WELCOME. READY TO GET GOING? 14 THE DEFENDANT: 15 N0, N0, YOUR HONOR, BECAUSE 16 WE GOT US A LITTLE PROBLEM BECAUSE I STILL HAVE 17 QUESTIONS I'D LIKE TO ASK BOTH OF THEM. 18 MR. WHITENHILL: 19 THE COURT: 20 MR. WHITENHILL: THESE WITNESSES. WELL, WHAT DO YOU WANT TO DO? SHORT OF MY CLIENT 21 REPRESENTING HIMSELF, I'M ELECTING NOT TO BRING THOSE 22 WITNESSES. 23 UNLESS HE'S GOING TO HANDLE HIS CASE, IT'S MY 24 DISCRETION NOT TO BRING THEM. NOW HE'S MAKING THE REQUEST, BUT AGAIN, I UNDERSTAND. 25 THE COURT: 26 MR. WHITENHILL: BUT HE H E WOULD LiK~ '1'V li u vN '1'nr~ ~ti~~. 2$ ~ THE COURT: W"ELL -- 11 MAY CHOOSE TO DO WHAT Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 23 of 58 Page ID #:23 r ~ 265 1 MR. WHITENHILL: 2 THE COURT: WHAT DO YOU WANT TO DO? I'VE ALREADY RESPONDED, I'M NOT BRINGING THOSE WITNESSES ON MR. MYERS. 4 OWN. 5 DECIDED NOT TO SUBPOENA THEM. 7 TO HIM WHETHER HE WANTS TO SUBPOENA THEM OR IVOT. 6 MY UP 3 HERE. YOUR ATTORNEY IS A PROFESSIONAL. 9 ARE YOU READY TO PROCEED? THE COURT: 11 THE DEFENDANT: 12 THE COURT: WELL, SHALL I RING THE BELL AND MR. WHITENHILL: THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. 19 THE COURT: YES, YOUR HONOR. MS. EHRLICH: MR. MYERS, WE'RE ALL READY EXCEPT YOU, SO I'M GOING TO HAVE TO GET US STARTED, LET'S GET A MISTRIAL. 21 THE DEFENDANT: 22 THE COURT: - ALL RIGHT. 23 24 ARE YOU READY Td PROCEED? 18 20 I'M READY TO PROCEED, YOUR HONOR. 16 17 N0, I'M NOT. GET US GOING? 14 15 HE DOESN'T WANT THEM THERE. 10 13 HE'S HE'S NOT THE ONE WHO WAS THE DEFENDANT: 8 IT'S HERE WE G0. LET'S BRING OUT OUR JURY. (THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE. HELD 25 IN OPEN COURT; IN THE PRESENCE OF 26 THE JURY: ) 27 2~ MR. WHITENHILL: RECESS FOR A FE% Y^UR HONOR, MAY WE ASK FOR A MINt?TES AT THiS TIr•;~ OUTSIDE THE 1L Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 24 of 58 Page ID #:24 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABE4S CORPUS: PERMISSION TO REENTER ': i , -; CODES AO~, 'petition~r, Michael C. '~~r rs, pursuant to California Penai.Code (P C.') § 147:3(a~, California Rules of'CvLrt (Cal. R.. Ct.) 4.551 et seq., and all other relevant and applicable rules and laxs, a nd h~re~y rmq~:es.ts fo. ~h~ abaa~ e~ti~led 'court Ito issue forth~rith, a e~~it of habeas; corpus sp~cificallg orde ring petitioner's current ; c onviction for es-felon. i~ possession of a firearm to be reversed , 2r.~ ~~~~ted 'a~ 3~ is t#~at sueh conviction was rendered in violation j i of, inter. alia, petitioner's snbsta'ntial 'rights .to effective a ' assistance of counsel, to'~+hich petition er, further- states as follows: ~ I. ;JUTtISDYCTIOI~ f i ; ~ 1. Citing P+.C. § 1473(a) znd~the rele vant portion thereof: ~; ~ __ [".]Every person !unla~fullq imprisoned or restrained of his liberty ~, -iunder any `pre tense Whatsoever; maq pros ecute a ►+nit of habeas corpus ~to inquire into' ,the cause of such; ~unlaaf u~] impiison~ent. See e.g. , '~ I nlre Ramirez, (2001) 10~ CsI. RpEr.2d 299; Cal. ' R. Ct. 4.551(c). . __ i~ . 1 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 25 of 58 Page ID #:25 4 ' i i ,; . donee`' nox'."e.ven: what most ;good„lawyer s ,wa'ulu ihave~ .~on.e_;;~~ .~dut~ sim_p1y_ .. ~, whether "s`o~e :reasonably ~aaJ~'r" eoula have acted,, in the r circumstances as defense couhsel:ac.ted, in;': the case';at.:-,b.a.r . ;. ;See, ',.. ~' I _ Coleman v. Calderon, (9th Cir. 1998) 150 F.3d 1105, 1113. ~ ,~ _ ,: : : Here,'' petitioner submits,! as explainQ :in d 'gre~a:ter. detail. below , ,. t hat 'even applying 'a -:heavy measure''.o.f defe rence, his trial counsel ~, provided dzfzcient !performance when he fail ed to investigate, locate. a nd 'present at trial for ~onfron.taton, purpos~s, a .material (."citizen';. informant"):witness raho provided poli ce. with information that petitioner was in 'possession of a firearm. ' ~ I—B. The Citizen Informant Was A Mate rial Witness.` i i As the record in this case reflects , an Officer Baker (Baker), u pon looking for possible dropped narcotics and weapons, xas contacte d b y ,a person ("citizen") fwho spok e from en apartment window who ~ ~ provided (Raker) with information that petitioner ..was in possession i of 'a firearm. See e. g., iExh. R hereto. Based on such information, Baker xas prompted to con tact peti tioner's parole agent for purposes i , i ; ' j j i j _ ~, f —2— . Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 26 of 58 Page ID #:26 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 27 of 58 Page ID #:27 -4- 4 . - Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 28 of 58 Page ID #:28 - ' _ ~ ~ ~ ~.' ~ ~' 1 ~ a ~ I ~ the: prosecution or helps the defense. ~ f ~ ~ ,'Evidence' is "material" ~",ot~ly if 'therei,is a reasonable probability that,;had [it] been disclosed to the 'de'fense, the 'result...w~oul!d have; been different.""' See People is r. Superior Court (Meraz) (2008); 165 Cal.'App.4th.28 47 (quoting , ,: ~ ; , People v.'~ Earp, (1999) 85 Cal ., Rptr. 2d 857; ; United States •. Bagley, j ' (1985) ;473 U.S. 6b7, 674-678; 'Brady ~. Maryland, (1963) 373 `U S " ~ ~: 83 ) "Moreover the `duty to disclose exists regardless of whether' i Ii 'there .has . ': been a request by the accused, and the suppression of `' e vidence that is materially favorable to the accused violates due l p rocess regardless whether it was~intentio,nal, negligent: or i nadvertent."`Meraz, ~at 'p. k7 (quoting Sordesten, ,supra at p. 1163.) ,! i i_ ~. Here; and incorporating Ground I supra by reference as `if fully .- j !re~rritten 'herein, ' p~tit~ioner has :shown *~i,th persuasion that the aforementioned "citizen informant" was both'"mater.ial" and equated ~ .; ~f ~ , to, p e.ti.tioner':s ,~ primar y accuser,•. r f , that he was effectively deprived of 'his substantial right to con.front ' 1 ~ i ~~ ,~ i ' ~ , Petitioner has. also ,demonstrated ,; ', 'i I ~ such! witness at anytis~e.` ~ '. ~s such! ~ ~~'t1~7.Otl~Y , ~ now ~ub~its that the y 'prosecution's 'failurQ to disclose the idenEity. and whereabouts of ' i the above noted citizen informant was error of a prejudicial m agnitude: ~ ;. This notion is especially buttressed by the fact that petitioner had two!..trials as to his current crime of. conviction-:-the „. first resulting in a hung jury with the majority ; of the 'jurors v,oting~ for not guilty--all 'of 'which :indicates the "closeness" of the case a nd lack~ of oderwhelming evidence of guilt. Thus, Without " disclosure," petitioner was likewise deprived of the ability to i " look into" whether or not evidence could be conjured up to impeach ii . 5_ { ~ ~ I' ~1 ~ Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 29 of 58 Page ID #:29 i I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l '~ , such:,' person's.credibil;itq, such as!, but not limited to, prior arrests, L } . :__ . :~ ~ c ondict'ions ;- a nd the like. i . f In sum, t he prosecution's failure to ;disclose as described ;herein i n conjunction'with traal counsel!'s defic ent' performance as outlined r ~ ~ _ ~ f i h erein ante, clearly prejudici~allq; impacted the - integrity and ~ .. I fun:d`amental fairness of pet'itioner's overall trial proceedings. ~ ~ '~ ` Any seasoning to the contrary should be discounted. I I i ~ ' _ ~.. ~ I ~ ~ i. ~ For ~'all of the foregoing reasons and those stated in the exhibits t ; ,, ~_" ;,CONCLUSION :I ,' i h ere,t,o, ~ ~t.he sought £or. re~;ief formally'' praged.-,for supra -should b~ ' ~ granted fat this time. : ~ i ~: ~ ~ i ~. F ' Respectfully submitted, ~. i ,~ ~ , i ` ~ ~ Michael C Myers , .CDCR ~C-32166, EW=341L ' C. T.F. 'Central Facility -P.O. Box '689 Soledad,:'Calif. '.9396.0-0689 ~ ;~ ~ ' j; ~ ~. ~. i~ ; 'I i ,. Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 30 of 58 Page ID #:30 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 31 of 58 Page ID #:31 ~ Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 32 of 58 Page ID3#:32 15 i.—. y .~ V 1 N0, . HE 2 ;, A Q WHAT_ -HAPPENED ,THEN? ,. , . . ` 3. .__ . _: ,_, . P. ; _ I DIDN!•T: ~: ~. ,; ; BELIEVE IT W A~ AT THAT PO'I'NT 'i~HAT `' P.SKED WHO LIVED AT THE LOCATION. ; 4: 'INFORMED 5 THAT ' 6 ME THAT HE `DID. THE ~DEFENDANT THE OTHER SUBJECTS TOLD ICE : THEY LIVED SOMEWHERE - ELSE. ? I ~ , I LEET'TH05E SUBJECTS'WITH OTHER - 8 OFFICERS AND I BEGAN TO THE 9 AREF,, THE NORTH P,URTION'OF THE, DRIVEWAY WHERE THE ONE RUIdo RESPONLING -- I'RESPONDED 10 ' SUB;JECT HAD I '_BEGAN 11 F~NY~ POSSIBLE' DROPPED 12 NATURE, AND I 'WAS iGONTACTED sBY '~, SUBJECT". 13 14 THREE MEN 15 __ Q A ;OKAY WEAPONS OR THIS AREA xQAFCCOTICS OR ,. _--16 - WERE i YC~iJ ~'C~NTACTED BY OF FOR THAT N~ Q LOOKING IN ~ ONE OF THESE THAT WE !VE ALREADY TALi{ED P~BOUT? , H OW 'WERE: YOU COI~TTACTED? - A 17 I 'HE - SUBJECT SPOKE TO NE THROUGEi A~ e ~I i WINDOW. 18 19 Q ~ i 2O YOU? -- ~ A 21 DID:THIS`PERSON IDENT:IFY'THEMSELVES T:0 ~ — ~' NQ, HIE DID NOT. k 22 ~ ~ ; 24 ~ ~ ~ AND.ytD' .YOU~ r3AVE A CONVERSATION', WITH'' YES,''- I D:TDt _ ' i ~ THIS 'PERSON? 23 '25 Q ~ ~ ~ _ - AD1D ~,S A RESULT OF TFi1S CGNVERSATION 26 f t 27' TtiHAT, 3F ANYI, CONCLUSIONS DID YOU 2$ ~ THE DEFENDANT WAS, I:NVOL~TED . IN THE --- POSSIBLY BEING ~ ~ A ! WELL DRP,W? IT HEIGHTENED MY SUSPICION THAT. 22 ~I Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 33 of 58 Page ID #:33 r _ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ {/~---- `) s/r~ i 2 i ; ., - ~ ji A ~ - i i :. .. 3'1 6 i' -. A ND i~HATj HAPPENED. THEN" '. ` ~ ~ I BEL-I EVE I RE;QUES.TED A; SUPERVISOR ~ _ i ;- Q 3 ~ ~ a : ,_~ ~~ ~ ~ II~T+ POSS_ESSI~ON OF. A FIREARM.' 1 ., ~ ,F -.,,~„ /~~ f' ~; ~ is WITH A; CELLULAR: PHOIV;E TO' RESPOND. T0: THE LOCATION. 50:. I ,~ ~: ;. ~° .-:COULD ;CONTACT . STATE ;PAROLE A~NDI :OBTAIN A PAROLE -SEARCH FORi 'THE ~ ~ -. -. 6 G ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ 8 9 -CON~ACTED~, IS THAT.~ERGEANTJONES? . .A LOCATION ~ ~, - Q ~=. _ ' ~. A ND I=S ~. THE :S UP,ERVI S OR ,~ - ' YE5 - i ~ I ' . ~` 1Q THAT Y.OU - THE _GENTLEMAN-':WHO TESTIFIED .BEFORE ' , 4 11 ~ 12 I. I- i 13 ~' ~ 14 k. _ ~ YOB? , • ~ i ~ A YES ~ ~ ~ ,. . , ' .. - AND D-ID HE ASSIST: YOU Q A ', IN. .;THAT YE,S, ~HE !DID.. :HE SHOWED: UP AT , , ; . REGARD? THE LOCATION. 15 ~' 16.: '. iAND I3.E.~.'HAD A CELLUi.~RR , F.HONE? ~ .. . i~ ~ Q' - . ._ ~ ; _ •DID -YOiI ; Ct~1~TACT SOMEONE ,FROM ;PARaLE:? ~; ' , ; ,.. AYES', ~ I~ DID ~ r _. ~ ... - ~8 ~, ~~ ~ ° ~ =Q ~• ~, I ' 19 .'.A ~2p Q ,Tr~HO. DIII,;YOU .TRH' T;O. CONTACfi ~FI.RST?. ,. ~ . ~ ;A: ,WELL, :I FIRST; TKI,ED TO 'CONTACT M1~. , ~: El ~. ;i ., 22 .,WHO~ IS 'A ~PAROL~E,= M CCRARY; :OFFICER..,. EUT HE,; DID14'T_LI~T ; _ 23 H S .I 2 d. AFTER HOURS PHONE 25 6. 2 .! i NUMBER ;WITH TN~E POLICE DE:PAR^1MENT . SO °I ~H~AD . , ~' THIS i NUMBER TELEPHONED .. = NCl WAi'.,QF~ GET.TIN.G. AHQLD 1, :7 : KN~:W THAT ,PAROLE LISTED WZ..T.H ITHE POLICE , AGENT OF HIM. IION SMITH ..HAD. D'EPA' RTMENT, ~ SO I , HIM. PAi~O~S .~GENT SMITH GAVE ME MR. ~ ,: — , MGCRARY' S iiOME PHONE •.NU-MBER -AND .TOLD ME THAT BEFORE ,. 28 I T WAS 2 . 3.. _ -- __. : -- _ . i' Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 34 of 58 Page ID #:34 r• ~ POMONA, CALIFORNIA; TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 1995 2 3 ~ - 2:10 P. M. DEPARTMENT EAST "M" 4 ':HOIV., CHARLES W. MCCOY, JR. JUDGE (APPE~RANC~ES-AS HERETQFORE NOTED.) 5 6 (THE FOLLO°VdING PROCEEDINGS WERE 7 HELD IN -0`PEN COURT IN THE = 8 PRESENCE ~OF 'FHE JiJRY : ) 9 (THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE 1D HELD ~N OPEN COURT OUT OF THE 11 PRESENCE ;OF THE ~3LTRY :) 12 __ 13 THE COURT: WE ARE ON THE RECORD ON PEOPLE VERSUS MYERS . .. _ .. . f 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ~ ~1 22 IF COUNSEL;'CAN MAKE THEIR APPEARANCES. MR. NEL~ON: ^1 HI~NK YOU; YOUR HONOR, DEPUTY PUBLI-~' DEFENDER: ON BEHALF OF MR . MRS. E ~'_RL I CH : GOOD AFTERNOON . MARK NELSON, MI CI~AEL MYERS . GAIL EiiRLI C'ri ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE. THE COURT: DEFENDANT IS PRESENT IN COURT. MISS EHRLICH. MRS. EHRLICH: Y=OUR HONOR, IT 15 MY UNDERSTANDING THAT PRIOR TO PROCEEDITdG WTTn TRIAL IPd THIS MATTER 23 .COUNSEL HRS A 4.02 1~IOTIflN RELATING TO MIRANDA RIGHTS, IF 24 I UNDERSTAND IT. 25 MR . NELS01•J : THA:T V~~IT L BE CORRECT, YOUR HONOR . 26 THERE IRE ACTUALT y SEVERAL .ISSUES THAI I UdISH TO 27 ADDRESS IN A 402. 28 ISSUES IS GOING TO BE CONTESTED BY THE PEOPLE, THAT I BETIEVE AT LEPS7' ONE OF THOSE ~ r. Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 35 of 58 Page ID #:35 m Tnr~~~_~~u~_~N4N~'MDUS--~.~~~RMAN~~'I-~_ ~~I~--~~~~N~'--i+~I~7~~ _ 2 . .:PERSON ,;THAT-,WAS _S~EAKIN~ FROM A"'`WINDOW,= :M~L~E UO3CE '3-: ; _. - . BELI-EVE - IT WAS THE DESCRIPTION THAT _OFFI-CE~Z--BAKER `GAVE . 3 __ _ - 4 5 _ __ 6 _— MRS EHRLI CH: . PEOPLE- DO ,NOT INTEND TO~-.~O INTO 'THAT AREA_.._ _ :. .. -THE - COURT i ---ALL R3GHT . ;: -. - :MR. NELSON =. .. 7 8 9 THAT I-S 'CORRECT-, YOUR HONOR . -THE„ MR. NELSON: -_ - --- ----- _ - THE NEXT ISSUE WOULD BE CONCERNING AN F~REA OF THE ALLEGED STATEMENT BY MR. MYERS, AND THAT 10 WOULD BE THE DISCUSSION' CONCERNING THE SO-CALLED GHOST 11 TOWN SMOKER. IT'S ?~'IY UND_ERSTADTDING y2 THAI THE OFFICER, __ 13 OFFICER BAKER;-AS - HE —IN~iCATED IN_.H_IS _REPORT DURING A la DISCUSSION WITH MR. MYE.RS, MR. MYERS ALLEGEDLY REFERRED 15 16 TO THE GUN AS A GHOST TOWN-SMOKER, WHICH .I BELIEVE : -_ OFFICER BAKER HAS TESTIFIED TO OR FELT RELATES TO A - GUN 17 THAT WAS USED IN A HOMICIDE, 187. SITvCE IQO 187__IS BEIPvG.ALLEGED OR TO M~' lg 19 KNOWLEDGE HAD BEEN TIED-. INTO - THAT PARTICULAR GUN, I 20 THINK THAT THE MENTION!OF.=--.THE TERM_ "GH.OST TOWN SMOKER" 21 AND DISCUSSION ABOUT IT WOULD BE QUITE PREJUDICIAL 22 UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES. 23 YOUR HONOR, THE STATEMENT WAS-MADE >. iN RESPONSE TO QUESTI01~75 RELATING TO HOW MUCH DID YOU 24 MRS. EHRLICH: 26 PAY FOR THE GUN AND IT`EXPLAINS - WHY THE GUN WAS , . .. OBTAINED FOR, ACCORDING"TO THE DEFENDANT, $40~ - .AND S0 27 HE WAS EXPLAINING THIS` IS A GHOST TOWN SMOKER, WHICH MY 28 OFFICER WILL TESTIFY BASED-UPON HIS TRAINING AND 25 - - -- 25 ) - - Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 36 of 58 Page ID #:36 /1 1/ Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 37 of 58 Page ID #:37 Case No. NOTICE OF MOTIO0i..BY...R~'TITIOIdER ! lICElAEL C. llYE~dS F0& ~.:N~d TRIAL PURSUANT TO PC §.17~~:9; ~NEWL3~ ~ISCOYERED ' EI/IDENCE FURSUA~IT TO Pe <,~1181; FALSE s POLIC£ REP0~2T FU~SLlA~I~ .T~ PC X148.3, 14 .5; U~++IIQUALIfI~I1-,:STATEd~EDIT .RURSUAN~' :..~0 _PC ~f125 _ 16 17 18 TO THE I~ON~~mBLE •JUDGE; I,, petitioner l~ictaael C. Myers, do 19 hereby request a n~v ~traal, or evidentiary hearing upon the 0 2 following ground that: 21 1. Newly discovered evidence aQuld give petitioner a fair 22 opportunity to -plead his.case and make a diffecence in the 23 outcome of a ne,~r trial. 24 zs Ba~cxcuoo~a 26 27 28 On l2/9/2015.petitianec-received crucial evidence from the Poona Police DepartAent, vi~ich proves his place of residence ~~ ---- Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 38 of 58 Page ID #:38 1 2 3 4 5 6 at the time of .h is arrest. This evidence,is.crvcial because the --__ _ . arresting officer (Baker) never once checked where petitioner lived. At the time of.-his arrest petitioner resided at 888 Ashfield Ave., in the citX of. Pomona .(see.-Ex. (A) and (B). Officer baker ans3 Sergeant Gordon Jones, under a parole search, 7 did not search -.the true. residence .of petitioner. Officer faker 8 and Sergeant Jaaaes ks~ev in advance that they were (vit~iout a 9 search v~srant) s~archi~ag the residence of Lynn McArthur and not 10 petitioner's Csee Ez. {A)(B)(c). 11 ~is,~a~ch teed informed officer Baker earlier that petitoner's i1 pare of residence vas 8~8 Ashfield Ave.•-and not the residence 13 of Lynn McArthur. ~4 At trial offices Baker gave perjured testimony to the jury in 15 thfs case. faker's p~s~ured testiwony vas- used by the prosecu tor 16 to get a co~evriction. T~~ prosecutor also failed to disclose 17 critical docu~eents~ f.os the jury to see. Said docuean~ts could ~8 t~avz made ~ difference in the outcome of the trial because 19 petitioner had a right to have the jury hear all the evidence 20 in this case. 21 ~etatioraer will show new evidence on this claims (see Ex. (A) 22 (B) and Art. ;~ §15 of: the California Constitution). 23 24 Petitioner vas deprived of.l.ife, l.iber.ty a.nd property without due process of law. This court should grant petitioner's emotion 25 for a new trial in the interest of justice. 26 ~'etitioraer has established a priiaa .facie case and has explained 2~ why this court should order the lover court to answer petitioner's 2g oration on new evidence. Petitioner's new evidence vas never Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 39 of 58 Page ID #:39 1 introduced at the trial to the jury. (see Ex. (A)(B)(C). The jury 2 vas denied the right to hear and see all the relevant evidence 3 in this case. 4 F ~ 6 7 8 Dated 1 ~ ~ I ~ — .~,(~ ~ ~i~ : By: !lichael C. Myers In Pra Per 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 6 27 28 ~3 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 40 of 58 Page ID #:40 My name is Angeles, Michael Craig California, I am 53 Myers; I years was old, born and in Los ~aVC been incarcerated for the last twenty (20) years for a gun that was not in my possession, which produced no matching fingerprints on the gun that belong to me. The only thing that I know is coming from Officer Baker, was his testimony that he is the only Officer that. had an alleged conversation with the alleged anon~~ous informant, that he did not introduce at the trial. BACKGROUND On May 3, 1995, I was arrested for alleged [Possession of a Firearm by a Felon] Penal Code §12021 (A),(1). The facts the Jury heard in this case ended in a hung jury 9 to 3 in favor of acquittal. There were no fingerprints tying me to .any gun. On April 10, 2015, I received my transcripts and I was not aware that the Jury did not believe ~~ Officer Baker's i Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 41 of 58 Page ID #:41 F - testimony; there was an issue of his creditability. My Constitution of the Fourteenth Amendment of my Due Process to have a fair trial was a violation. Trial Counsel was ineffective assistance by allowing trial court to introduce evidence from a third party which is hearsay. This case is identify me, about a this is key eye-witness what Officer who claimed to Baker alleged and testified to, and however, to this day there is still no witness so how can I call this person to confront the allegations made against me. The only evidence prosecution introduced right now, at trial no other was the witness testimony can of Officer corroborate if Baker, Officer Baker is telling the truth. I would like to know the truth because I am innocent, I need to find out the truth does this anonymous person exist, this is a real question? That no one is trying to answer. I believe I have the right to confront my accused under the Sixth Amendment (6th), of the United States Constitution. I am hoping look into my case as I have spent the your officer will last twenty (20) years of my life trying everything to get someone to listen to me, so I pray ti~at someone from your officer will look into this case. TAKE NOTICE The Trial Court, District Attorney Officer, two of the Trial Attorney's did not know the identity of the anonymous witness,Officer Baker, did not know the identity of the person who he talked to. All parties failed to do an investigation in this matter. Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 42 of 58 Page ID #:42 There is an eye-witness to this case; this individual was never however, called the to D.A. testify used the for the District statements of Attorney, this alleged witness against me. It is the duty of the Court to establish a Prima Facie case to the Jury, the Jury has the right to make there own determination based on all the physical and material evidence. The only one the Jury did not hear from is the key eye-witness to the D.A. case; this is a miscarriage of justice. Trial court failed to hold an (In Camera Hearing) to determine his/her credibility which never took place. Under Amendment confront and to the (6th), and have United States guarantee's cross-examine Due Process all Constitution, citizens witnesses under the The the against right him Fourteenth Sixth or to her; Amendment (14th), to have a fair trial. I pray that I have at least opened your mind to launch severe miscarriage of justice. an investigation into this Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 43 of 58 Page ID #:43 DECLAR~TiOH OF PETITIO~EB __ 1 ~iIC~3AEL C. MYE~S- IN SLTPP(~R1' i3F l9~3TI0~7 TO SUPP&ES5 EYIt~EN~E 14 15 15 i7 18 19 I, ?~ach~~l C. ~I~~~rs is f~~ailiar ~it~i X11 the fa~ta ia~ thQ ca~~ and declare th~t,ar~evid~ntiary ~~a~ing is necessary to resolve t he issue in this notice of ~so~ion. 2 0 21 Petitioner also has inclosed tt~e follouirg exhibit : 22 23 24 25 EXE3IBIT 1: Property Report EXHIBIT 2: Registration Worksheet EXHIBIZ` 3: Postage Record 2b 27 28 I delcare under thr penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true anr3 correct. ~ , Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 44 of 58 Page ID #:44 _____ 1 _ .___Executed at California Training Facility, Soledad, California 2 on 5` I :,L ~- ~~i P (~~ 3 4 5 6 7 8 F ~ 1D 11 12 13 14 15 i6 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 3 24 25 26 27 28~ ~M ` b Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 45 of 58 Page ID #:45 November 13, 2015 Friday 7:03 p. m. A ttn: Property Receipt Department Pomona Potice nepartment 490 W. mission Blvd. P omona ~ CA. ` 1 7h 5 ~~ R E: Need Property Receipt During Booking ~ 3~ (~ ~ f5 near Property ~teceipt Department, r an you please send me the or i•3:~.za1 Property Receipt, for the following BOOKING # : ~~ ~~~__ _ _ _~, ~'~ere I w.ss booked on this date of '~ J ~- t jr5? T hank you. ~ sinc~tely, Michael Myers C-32165 C TF Central EW-137-Low P .O. Box 539 Soledad ~ CA. X 3960-05P9 Michael Myers ' u Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 46 of 58 Page ID #:46 04/22/95 21:59 P r o p e r t y R e p o r t DR #:_95_- 067040 _ _ __Booking 3~:_G0204144 Page: 4 Name: MYERS , MICHAEL CRAIG Addr: 888 ASHFIELD City: POMONA CA 91767 Telephone #: Social Security #: 556 - 35 - 4963 Sex: M Rafe: B Height: 5 11 Weight: 172 Hair: Eyes: . Arrest ~~~".3,4/22 ~ 95 Arrest Char5e: 3056 '"~~ ---~:s~--------~-r---------------------------------------------- 7 Locker #: 02 ~ 4~ 8 Booking Jail°er: ' "'~. 10 Desc. Bulk: 95 9 Bulk Property (Y/N): N 11 Arm Band (Y/N): Y 12 Cash Deposited: . , 10.43 .fy~~r~~" , ~a~" ~Z~~ j5 ~hF~ Description ~',~E~a~ ; y ~ ~~3 ~s,, BLU SHIRT/BLU SHORTS ~~;, ~~ ~° ~~ yaF GLOVES/BLK-WHT SHOES/WI~'Y' 54~~;KS =~~ YM WATCH/YM RING RED-CLR STONE ~~~ PAPERS/ELECTRICAL CORD ~~'~,.,.. ~ ~~' Retained By Frisaner y N s ~~y~• N 3g~ N Siqniture for Property Retained Signiture for Property Returned RECORD OF s'~"' Person adding or receiving Description of property ~;Date Added Received Added Received Added Received !- urn Intials Prisoner ~ . sailer ,+ .~ Pr toner ' ~f ~ Y. ~ -, i 1 ~~ ~ ~a:, ~~`risoner Jailer ~~Q' , r .-. DR#95-067040 ~ ti i r ,tea ~k"~a~Teo r ' 4 ~ o' ~S °"~ ~O C~ ~ 490 W. Mission I~lvd., Pomona, CA 91766 Police Department POMoN~ THE CITY OF : ,::~~:;s ._ ,.,j...~...._~~~,i~~ir~ s: ~ ~_~~~~r:~~,.~ ~~'°'w ~ ~=s: r,n=~..n F i~sHr f~! 91 ~`n~~~ 'F~r~sr-r lilii„~i~„ill~i~~il~iii,i,~„i,iiiii~iilililliii,ii~„ii,iiill MICHAEL C MYERS C-32166 ~ 137 ~ P. 0. BOX 689 SOLGDAD, CA 93960-6£i9 ~ ~ ~ =~ti ..r~~s~~~arasr Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 47 of 58 Page ID #:47 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 48 of 58 Page ID #:48 _ .~O:n~iai~~0'r1bS REGISTRATION ORKSHEET rcnarwcc or •t~soM n«oc ~S n. ~ ice. ~ cc►+rR uTon~a Ma ~ i / y° .,,--i -. 8 , #pct dll704[ MAM[ vrr. ~`~~•" ' (~iChcle(l~rc9nacf'.. `~ ~~ OI ~IAtM O•f~ C, `1~~C.hQC 1 ~' 'G rJ J~(L~Qx. ~► ` '-~C~ f?'leyers, h?~Chac~ CY~~~ A~r ~ ~~"r- VEhIGLE: LIC~~~SE b pIS~RIPTI~:~~ 111MTZD cttu~•T~n~ i at /IRE7 M~ML l~~~~ ~h~l~lG C~G, C f'/r'~ ~ ~ ~~/~ ~ C~Ai ANb M~A~l~ ~, ~' ~~fT N~~1[ ~~~,~ fat1~IDER ~ 3a~ S• ~~ATE:~1- .~. ._~ ,. 1 ;/ ~~ G57.1P~ t~wCt Or ~i •~~uT•r~oti Plt61/TpATtOM IM c~Nru~~+~~Kes wiTw: f 100 M\/C~~,.~ C 1T 12[M ~MIf /Vo~r.- !00 P~~, :~J I ST.S;r~fE1T OF F£GISTRA'~7' CO\CE}tTlhG t~EASC\ FOR RECISTRATIOA' D ~.'1L tlR ~dpC~T OR CCT:NTI D►d ~ CMAAG[ Olt ~U~ON ACM DRLRTION A RALLTINa AO~trCY ,/-~ f~ ,,~,',/~ M SC i[CT~Ow w0. TYP'c BF NAR~~?T1~: ~/~'~ ~~ ~r ~/ 3~`~ ,c~R~,~. "V 5ti OAT[ 01 ~ tLLAi[ ~` rlt6Crt~MOR J f~O1ATION OA f/ROL[!-FOII TMIf OIFCNfi CONj+fT10N~ RLOUTAIM6 A[6H~I11.T10H Probation Officer Name dnd Add one j m~,~ra r Phone : ~y ~~ y~y.S, ~rnrn~ , ~ . ~, , s~~d~.- ~~ ~ `~ ~ ~~ ~ 7 [X►IRA110M DAT( C,~j_ s~ — ~ ""'~ soci~L ncwRiTr Nu~s[~t: y~ ~[L~710N{M1~ ADOR[~• l~ti LM[IRGENCYl10TtFY~N~N[ .__=~`~1f.~}CJ.~.~ ~ ~ \ C~"C I e r oMrH~ ~Rivcn•s ~rccNsc v ~' ' ~NEHLNDLD fLNT[NCi Oil TIME: IFi[—AMCUKT I ,. S C/r V' N' ~ 1 ~l / -lY r r - % 7 1 ~~, : J ~V dr .l // ~(~fCN /GSA CG~M~TM[NT pA CMaAG~ CONYIGT.LD Qi: ' ~ C AT[ 0► CONVICTION 02l COMMITK[hT ~ ! r d d (t0 F'l`.1/~ ~1C~cY G'~~~. 'J'~?M6'~1 fn. (_G 2G ! r 1C.h~{f ~~ ~i~: i'OU EVEP. ~~~h FINCER.PRINSED BY THE PO?iONA POLICE DEPAAT?SENT F4R ANY F.JISON~ i.e., aAE57EE, PEAJ~iITTEE~ PEDLER, etc.? ,, ~ ~~~ ,~ (Q ~~ f I Yea. When? NO YES ~ Ch4P!11YC,', A~~MF '~~n F; ~~_~~ 6 __ DATE/TIME RECORD CHECK U•l rI~'.^, '~ r;~;y _ z' ' F:'ii = v` ~~JLfi' r' ----- RECORD BUREAU INFOf~}SATION ~~D ~' ?lonth „ Dey K. ~-~ C~CJG? ?imp Year (5lgnatuse) ~'NO ,1l'ST REGISTER 290 FC: Any person cet~;atn:~ sa mcn~ally dl,~ordered tea olfendrr or convicted under my of the (olbwinp r~pr or inisrrrcss,~ :~:.~^ e~alnst euturr), 4b6, 28'7, 488, 285, 486, 2$8, £85a, sutu~ec: Pcn~1 Calr SrNions 22^ (Auaull with Intent to commH :' ~ ! ~~e if offense ,847{d). 31 ,1, 311.E and Z72 (1! ofJrnie im~ol.~ed lewd end IasMviout cor►duct j. .vi ~tia.l, 261.2, 281.9. . aryd ~uh{ect wsi Conviettd prior to Sepi. 1S, 1961, w}►en ~ettfoa wos tst~pdiFed to 27Q PC. 311.1 in~•ol~•ed I~wd and lascf~~ious conduct end +v~~ rrraltBed eo ~lf.l snd ~lG.4 PC. 31 ].~ PC it eon.ictrd yrior to Seyt. I5, 1BS1, whe:+ ~rrtfon 'rangy ~ pert In~tftud~.,r, vhr~o'he wu c~Ca9ned beaw~e of eanvtetion 1:590 H a S i„~sce~: ~.~y prnon eonvirted, dueAa►QecY, a paroles Code 11J5~i, 33331, 1IJ52, lIJ5~7, IIJ~{, ]1335, 11957 11 58, 11358, 11 80, 31361, ~E ~r.~ of the following ~t~tutu: Health 6 Safrty under Sretion 11357. aieon+~le".:o~ under Ssetioa l1363, l) SSG, 1Z X68, 11554, 7'hls tecdon d^n not • a~~,y !a a miiuer.~~~r~or ponvtrtien u w• !lSSO invc?'i:;,^, marijusn~. ~ '~ ---- p _ Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 49 of 58 Page ID #:49 i t r. . a POMONR PARULc ~~h~, Tl~' Aug ~~ • ,94 9:35 No .003 P.05 L , - ~ i CAI.lFORNIA OEDARTI{gNT OF CCRRECT[W!S OE/1Z/1944 i cac ~: C32166 lest: MYERS S H E E T F A C E sraro: CA ct~»; M6 F1ret: MICHAEL PARaLE AMD COkMUNITY SERVICE6 DiV1YIQ11 Papet i sretue: AC~1Ve Middl~i CRAIG ~ MONfKERC9) Custody oaye: P~6pram Date: M iyp~t GontrQllina Q.gacr]vtl~, 4ffon~a Cod~i_ H11352(A) Y TRl1NS/SELL CS ~ _— --gPECil~l COtiDiT(4H'~ Mo Alcohol: Ant: N N 09/21/1992 oRo Po T'7 09/21J1993 Oate: Oatet O~te: Data: Detes [ OvsrrS~a ~~ Sex Rep ~ Arson Rap z Narectfes Rsye 3058.6 PC USINS N: ~ Trarupartcd: suspended lA ~ poa sate: u9r Eyaa: 06/22/1962 M 5'9" ~LX Fefnsteted ~ IdDO: CD (DATED PHOTO) eeporti col. i CO241d33 25646~W3 Fat r 556-35-0369 A0544?893 lA Macy: oaa sax Mpt H~1r: Pott 09~21~~995 CDD Dlacherpad: Rvkd: RaD scc c[t ~ ( ) i C~ 8LA 172 BP.O PRQBLEM AREAS M arcctici Assault t other t AltohOl: Bex c VEHICLE ~g4~r ~ ~ Medal Style ~~ ~QloPl/~41OP2 Sceta F198T AEGENI I~D9RE6~ L4V! wfih / C1ty 5t~rt OnTi { M94 Q3/12/1993 60185 htDST RE~EIiT dCB Y ta~t DstO LOC 1503-A ftroac f ~ i ~u~ DGMONAi 1624 ~ I~ start Qn (909) 6247734 9ti'I+~LL6laCe. 21D, Phone ~Y Emo~4Yl~ Awp~C (7} / C~ MYERB, MfCHAEL Q~i sect, i1D. Phonf 886 ASHFIELD CA 91767— POMC3NA C321bb ~,Ican:e MCCRARY, FU~JDW ~ Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 50 of 58 Page ID #:50 THE CITY OF Po!0/1~~~ Office of the Police Chief August 4, 2014 "Workinng Together Pomona's Future..." Michael Myers C32166 EW-137-Low P.O. Box 689 Soledad, CA 93960-0689 RE: Request for Dispatch Information Dear Mr. Myers: As stated in the previous letter dated 7-3-2014, the records have been purged, therefore, this i nformation has been destroyed and the dispatch recordings/transcripts are not archived. This agency does not accept called calls. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely ~~~ ~ ~~ Doreen Herrin g %~ Records Shift Supervisor Xc: file 490 W. Mission Blvd., Box 660, Pomona, CA 91766 (909) 620-2141 Faac (909) 620-2146 Pomona •Vibrant •Safe •Beautiful ~ ~'I Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 51 of 58 Page ID #:51 T~-{E CITY OF Office of the Police Chief July 3, 2014 "Working Together Pomona"s Future..." Michael Myers C32166 E 137E P.O. Box 689 Soledad, CA 93960-689 RE: Request for Dispatch Transcript DR #95-73911 Dear Mr. Myers: We have received your request for the above referenced Dispatch Transcript. In accordance with the law the purge criteria established by the California Department of Justice and the City of Pomona, these dispatch recordings. are no longer available, therefore no dispatch transcript is available. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Doreen Herring Records Shift Supervisor ( 909)620-2159 cc: file 490 W. Mission Blvd., Box 660, Pomona, CA 91766 (9d9)620-2141 Fax (909) 620-2146 Pomona •vibrant •Safe •Beautiful IS Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 52 of 58 Page ID #:52 MINUTE ORDER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DATE PRINTED: 02/04/16 ---------------------CASE N0. KA027232 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. DEFENDANT O1: MICHAEL CRAIG MYERS -----------------------------------------------------------------------INFORMATION FILED ON 06/01/95. COUNT O1: 12021(A)(1) PC FEL ON 02/04/16 AT 830 AM IN EAST DISTRICT DEPT EAF CASE CALLED FOR COURT CONSIDERATION FATTIES: WADE OLSON (JUDGE) ELIZABETH FELIX NONE (REP) NONE (DDA) DEFENDANT IS (CLERK) NOT PRESENT IN COURT, AND NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL THE COURT HAS RECEIVED, READ AND CONSIDERED THE DEFENDANT'S I~IV11QIV 'I V ~U F'r'1<tSS C~'1U Ci i~L'. DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(5): 1 THERE IS NO SUBSTANTIAL RIGHT THE DEFENDANT IS ATTEMPTING TO ) ENFORCE. 2 DEFENDANT IS A SENTENCED PRISONER. ) DEFENDANT IS NOTIFIED OF THE COURT'S RULING BY A COPY OF THIS MINUTE ORDER SENT VIA U.S. MAIL ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS: MICHAEL C.MYERS CTF-C EW-137L C-32166 P.O. BOx 689 SOLEDAD, CA 93960 N EXT SCHEDULED EVENT: P ROCEEDINGS TERMINATED PAGE NC. 1 COURT CONSIDERATION HEARING DATE: 02/04/.16 ~lir► rl~ Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 53 of 58 Page ID #:53 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL — SEtOND DIST. DIVISION FOUR gun 2~, ~o~ ~ In re JOSEPH A. LANE, Clerk B 275605 ~/. ~UZtl'1c~Ci MICHAEL C. MYERS, ( Super. Ct. No. KA027232) Wade Olson, Judge} ( on Habeas Corpus. ORDER THE COURT: The petition for writ of Habeas corpus has been read and considered. The petition is denied for failure to demonstrate entitlement to the relief requested. See ( People v. Duvall(1995)9 Ca1.4th 464, 474-475.) The petition also raises arguments considered and rejected by this court in several prior petitions (including B168557, B247691). (See In re Clark(1993)5 Ca1.4th 750, 769-770.) * EP~I'EIN, P. J. WILLHITE, ~1 J. De~uty Clerk Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 54 of 58 Page ID #:54 ____ SUPREME COURT __ -- _ _ FOLE~ SEP 14 2016 __ 5235959 Frar~~ A. f~cGui~e Clerk Deputy IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA En Banc In re MICHAEL CRAIG MYERS on Habeas Corpus. The petition for writ of habeas carpus is denied. (See hz re Robbins(1998) 18 Ca1.4th 770, 780; In re Clark(1993)5 Ca1.4th 750, 767-769;In Ye Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d 734, 735.) Corrigan, J., was absent and did not participate. CANTIL-SAKAUYE ChiefJustice ~~ _.. Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 55 of 58 Page ID #:55 UNI'T'ED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT P .O. Box 193939 95 Seventh Street San Francisco, CA. 94119-3939 May 26, 2016 Michael C. Myers C-32166E 137E P.O. Box 689 Soledad, CA. 93960-689 Dear Mr. Myers: This court is in receipt of your recent correspondence to this court. A review ofthe record reflects no pending cases filed by you in this court. This is a court of limited; urisdiction which means that it can only review cases which have been f filet'. and then decided in a U.S. District Court within this circuit. irst Your correspondence is being returned to you in the event that you wish to pursue your action in the U.S. District Court. A copy ofthis court's rules and procedures can be downloaded at www.ca9.uscourts.~o_v . Sincerely, FOR THE COURT: MOLLY C. Dw~'ER CLERK OF COURT By: Cyntharee Powells Deputy Clerk Local Rule 27-7 Iq Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 56 of 58 Page ID #:56 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL BY PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY -- ----__ (C.C.P. §§ 1023(A) 2015,5) I , _~l ~ LL ~ 1 Z.~yf/^ S declare I am over 18 years of age and I am party to this action. I am a resident of CORRECTIONAL TRAINING FACILITY prison, in the County of Monter-ey, State of California. My prison address is: CORRECTIONAL TRAINING FACILITY P.O. BOX 689, CELL #: ~ f3 Soledad, CA 93960-0689 On m il urge ~ i~c~r~ — `~ ? ZC1 (~ I served the attached: ra ~huesT~~T~ f~►~ar~'In~a~~ ~.x~~oa^r~,~,nT' ~o S~J~pb~°hA ~~~'T~~~ses on qty ~~h~,~~. on the parties herein by placing a true and corre ct copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope with first class postage fully prepaid in the United States Mail at the hands of prison staff utilizing the system designated ror legal mail at the Correctional Training Facility, Soledad, California, as per the Mailbox Rule (Rules 3(d) of the Federal Rules Governing ~ 2254) , addressed as follows : ~~ ~~~ ~ / ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~/,~ . ~ -. i ~,~- ~~" t i, ~c~~'1-~~ A ~ e ~1c~ ~ ~ i S ( ~~~ ~ ~ T f, ~ y ~ ~ ~~ ~v ~~ ~i Cam- ~ ~U~ ~~ cc L ~I r~ ~ ~ r ~ (2 ~ l^ ~ ~j ~.~~~ Ai~yel~S~ ~ fit. ~9C'~%12 — W~7~f~ ~ l~ ~~e~ ~ R ~i ~~~~ i 3 1 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the S tate of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on ~/J ^ ~~J ` ? e~ (,~D Declarant 2.D ~~ ~ ~~ f ~ 0 ~~ Y~~X c~ ~ ~ ~=~~=~ -~~7 ~~C~ ~~ - ~~7~ ~ ~ ,~~G\S~ o ~;,a~ f OCR ~ ~ ~~ pEG ~9TR ~ 1:EPK'Us.ti D ~~ G ~ " ,~-~ ~ .~S ~~q~~~5'~ ~~~~IG~f2~.-47<~ L 12 l~', S ~'Y'i'N~ s~. ~ ~- -~ ~ Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 57 of 58 Page ID #:57 Case 2:16-cv-07758-VBF-FFM Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 58 of 58 Page ID #:58

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?