Christopher L. Seamster v. J. Soto et al

Filing 51

ORDER ACCEPTING INTERIM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Percy Anderson for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 45 Defendant Legier is ordered to file a responsive pleading to the remaining claim asserted in the Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order. (sbu)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER L. SEAMSTER, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 J. SOTO, et al., 15 Case No. CV 16-07779 PA (RAO) Defendants. ORDER ACCEPTING INTERIM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint; the 18 Motion for Summary Judgment Based On Plaintiff’s Failure to Exhaust 19 Administrative Remedies (“Motion for Summary Judgment”) filed by Defendants 20 G. Biaggini, A. Lugo, F. Villalobos, J. Soto, and B. Legier (“Defendants”); all of 21 the other records and files herein; and the Interim Report and Recommendation of 22 United States Magistrate Judge (“Interim Report”). Further, the Court has made a 23 de novo determination of those portions of the Interim Report to which objections 24 have been made. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, 25 and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 26 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary 27 Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants, except for 28 Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment claim against Defendant Legier, are dismissed 1 without prejudice. Defendant Legier is ordered to file a responsive pleading to the 2 remaining claim asserted in the Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order. 3 4 DATED: November 5, 2017 5 6 PERCY ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?