Warren Mauran v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al

Filing 65

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT WAL-MART STORES, INC. by Judge R. Gary Klausner, 62 . Refer to the document for details. (pso)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITFI? S~'ATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WARREN MAURAN,an individual,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.
WAL-MART STORES,INC., a
Delaware Corporation; and Dt~ES 110, business entities, DOE5 11-2a,
individuals; DOES 21-30, inclusive,

16
Defendants
17

Case No. 2:16-cv-07808-RGK-JC
Assigned to: Hon. R. Gary Klausner
JUDGMENT FUR
6~8~~]
DEFFNDANI'WAL-MART
~TC~RES,INC.
[
Filed conci~~rently with: Memorandum
cif~I'oints c~nd Authos~ities; Statement of

Uncontroverted Material Facts and
Conclusions o Law; Declarations;
Appendix of vidence; Proposed Order
o Judg~nentJ
f

18
19

Hearing Date:
r
Tune:
C't~~urtrc~orn :

September 11, 2017
9:00 a.m.
~50

Pretrial Conf.:
~'i-ial:

October 2, 2017
October 24, 2U 17

20
21
22
23

Defendant VVaI-Mart Stores, inc.'s ("Walmart") motion for summary

24

judgment, or in the alternative partial summary j~idgment brought under Federal

25

Rule of Civil Procedure 56, on the Complair~.t of ~'laintiff Warren Mauran

"Plaintiff'), came an regularly before the ~Ianol-~ble K. Gary Klausner.
2 (
6
27
28
[
PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

The Court having read and duly considered the moving, opposing, and reply

1
2

documents, and having duly considered alp evide~lce and argument presented in

3

connection therewit~l, enters the following order ~n W"almart's motion for Summary

4

Judgment as follows:

5 ~

(1)

Walmart is entitled tc~ summary judgment on Plaintiff's first cause of

6

action for age dis~~ritr~ination under• t:l1eCalifornia Fair Employment

7

and Housing Act("F~I~A").

8

2}
(

of actioi7 for failure tc> prevent ~iiscri~nination under the FEHA.

9
10

(
3)

(
4)

13
14

Walmart is entitled to summar~~ judgment on Plaintiff's fourth cause of
action for declaratory relief.

(
5)

Walmart is entitled to~ surninary ju~c'gm~nt on plaintiff's fifth cause of
action for defamation.

15
16

Walmart is entitled t~ summary judgment on Plaintiff's third cause of
action for wrongful termination d~ •aiolation of public policy.

11
12

Walmarx is entitled to summary ji~clgrnen~. on Plaintiffs second cause

WHEREFORF,, Defendant Walmart is granted summary judgment in this

17

case and the Complaint is hereby dismissed witY~ prejudice, reasonable costs to be

18

awarded.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22
23

SEP Z 5 207
Dated:

201.7
R. G~
~Unit~

Klaus er
~t,a`es istrict Court Judge

24
25
2
6
27
28
. ~_
.

[PROPOSED) JUDGMLN"I'