Ted Nguyen v. Los Angeles County Office of Education et al

Filing 33

MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): Nunc Pro Tunc Order CORRECTING the Court's June 15, 2017 Order, REMANDING Case to State Court, and CLOSING the Federal Case by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. On June 14, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation re questing that the Court remand this action to state court. Dkt. 29 . The next day, on June 15, 2017, the Court adopted the parties proposed Order. Dkt. 30 . Although the Court believed that signing the proposed Order would remand the case to state court, the Court now recognizes that the Order contained some ambiguity as to the proper procedure for the parties to remand this case to state court. To clarify, the Court amends the June 15, 2017 Order nunc pro tunc by striking paragraphs two an d three of the Order. This matter is remanded to state court with Plaintiff to bear the costs and expenses incurred in connection with the removal and remand of the action, up to a maximum of $500, and the federal case is now closed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case remand to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case number BC605163. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lom)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

CV 16-7874 PSG (KSx)

Title

Nguyen v. Los Angeles County Office of Education et al.

Present: The Honorable

Date

June 20, 2017

Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge

Wendy Hernandez

Not Reported

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s):

Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings (In Chambers):

Nunc Pro Tunc Order CORRECTING the Court’s June 15,
2017 Order, REMANDING Case to State Court, and CLOSING
the Federal Case

On June 14, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation requesting that the Court remand
this action to state court. Dkt. # 29. The next day, on June 15, 2017, the Court adopted the
parties’ proposed Order. Dkt. # 30. Although the Court believed that signing the proposed
Order would remand the case to state court, the Court now recognizes that the Order contained
some ambiguity as to the proper procedure for the parties to remand this case to state court.
To clarify, the Court amends the June 15, 2017 Order nunc pro tunc by striking
paragraphs two and three of the Order. This matter is remanded to state court with Plaintiff to
bear the costs and expenses incurred in connection with the removal and remand of the action,
up to a maximum of $500, and the federal case is now closed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

AB for WH

CV-90 (10/08)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1