Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Techno Legend, LLC et al

Filing 11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause as to why this case should notbe dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An appropriate response will properly identify and indicate the citizenship of each of Techno Legend, LLC's owners or members. Defendants shall file their response to this Order no later than Thursday, November 10, 2016, at 4:00 p.m. (rfi)

Download PDF
LINK: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No. CV 16-07911 BRO (MRWx) Title TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA V. TECHNO LEGED, LLC ET AL. Date November 7, 2016   Present: The Honorable BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL, United States District Judge Renee A. Fisher Not Present N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION Plaintiff Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (“Plaintiff”) brought this action in on August 23, 2016, against Defendants Techno Legend, LLC and Saleh Shalomi. (See Dkt. No. 1 (hereinafter, “Compl.”).) In its Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that this Court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.1 (Compl. ¶ 1.) A federal court must determine its own jurisdiction, even where there is no objection to it. Rains v. Criterion Sys., Inc., 80 F.3d 339, 342 (9th Cir. 1996). Because federal courts are of limited jurisdiction, they possess original jurisdiction only as authorized by the Constitution and federal statute. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). Under § 1332, the Court has federal subject matter jurisdiction so long as all plaintiffs are diverse from all defendants and the amount in controversy is, at minimum, $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Here, Defendants’ Removal sufficiently alleges that Plaintiff is a Connecticut corporation with its principal place of business in Connecticut, that Defendant Saleh Shalomi is a California resident, and that the amount in controversy is $600,000. (See Compl. ¶¶ 3, 5, 36.) However, Plaintiff’s allegations regarding the                                                              1 Plaintiff also alleges that the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201. (Compl. ¶ 1.) “The Declaratory Judgment Act merely creates a remedy in cases otherwise within the court’s jurisdiction; it does not constitute an independent basis for jurisdiction.” Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. Cal. State Bd. of Equalization, 858 F.2d 1376, 1382–83 (9th Cir. 1988). Therefore, Plaintiff must rely on § 1332 to establish jurisdiction. CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL   Page 1 of 2 LINK: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No. CV 16-07911 BRO (MRWx) Title TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA V. TECHNO LEGED, LLC ET AL. Date November 7, 2016 citizenship of Defendant Techno Legend, LLC is not satisfactory. Plaintiff alleges that Techno Legend, LLC is a limited liability company with its principal place of business in California. (Compl. ¶ 4.) However, for establishing diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company “is a citizen of every state of which its owners/members are citizens.” Johnson v. Columbia Props. Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006). Plaintiff provides no information regarding the identity or citizenship of Techno Legend, LLC’s members or owners.   Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An appropriate response will properly identify and indicate the citizenship of each of Techno Legend, LLC’s owners or members. Defendants shall file their response to this Order no later than Thursday, November 10, 2016, at 4:00 p.m. : IT IS SO ORDERED. Initials of Preparer rf   CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL   Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?