Youth Justice Coalition et al v. City of Los Angeles et al

Filing 109

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver re Stipulation for Protective Order 108 NOTE CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THIS DOCUMENT (sbu)

NOTE: CHANGES HAVE BEEN
MADE TO THIS DOCUMENT

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14

YOUTH JUSTICE COALITION, a nonprofit organization; PETER ARELLANO
and JOSE REZA, individuals, for
themselves and on behalf of a class of
similarly-situated individuals,

15
16

Plaintiffs,
vs.

17
18

Case No.: 2:16-cv-07932-VAP-RAO

Complaint Filed: October 25, 2016
ORDER RE: PARTIES’
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.,

19
20

Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PARTIES’ STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

WHEREAS the Court has considered the Joint Stipulation regarding the

2

Protective Order and the Parties Stipulated Protective Order filed on October 19,

3

2017, by (a) Plaintiffs Youth Justice Coalition, and Peter Arellano and Jose Reza,

4

for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, and (b)

5

Defendant City of Los Angeles, (collectively “Parties”);

6

WHEREAS the Parties have conferred and agreed to enter into a Stipulated

7

Protective Order to protect the confidentiality of documents and information that

8

may be produced during the course of this matter, and to facilitate the production

9

of such documents and information;

10

WHEREAS the Parties have conferred and agreed that the Stipulated

11

Protective Order sets forth the conditions under which confidential documents and

12

information in possession of the Parties must be exchanged, used, and protected in

13

this litigation;

14

WHEREAS the Court finds good cause to enter the Stipulated Protective

15

Order, because investigation and discovery activity in this action are likely to

16

involve the production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for

17

which special protections from public disclosure and from use for any purpose

18

other than prosecuting or defending this litigation or any related appellate

19

proceeding;

20

Based on the above-referenced facts, representations, and promises, and

21

good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Protective

22

Order is approved and effective as of the date of execution of this Order, with the

23

exception that the Court strikes the last sentence in Paragraph 8.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

DATED:

October 23, 2017 _______________________________________
ROZELLA A. OLIVER
United States Magistrate Judge

2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PARTIES’ STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER