Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation et al v. Clinton Jeffrey Brock et al

Filing 19

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL by Judge R. Gary Klausner: [T]he Court orders a second Order to Show Cause re Dismissal. In its response, Plaintiff shall explain what additional records Defendant possesses from the relevant time period that warrants the filing and litigation of the current action. Plaintiff shall respond in writing no later than March 30, 2017. The response shall be limited to five pages in length. Failure to timely and adequately respond will result in dismissal of this action. (cr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

CV16-07968-RGK (MRWx)

Title

CARPENTERS SOUTHWEST ADMINISTRATIVE CORP, et al v. CLINTON
JEFFREY BROCK, et al

Present: The
Honorable

Date

March 28, 2017

R. GARY KLAUSNER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Sharon L. Williams

Not Reported

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal

On March 23, 2017, the Court issued an OSC re Dismissal. The Court ordered Plaintiff to show
cause in writing why the current case should not be dismissed as duplicative to related case 2:15-cv7188-RGK-MRW against The H.C. Brock Company dba The Brock Company (“Brock I”). On March
24, 2017, Plaintiff timely responded.
Plaintiff has included in its response a notice of Full Satisfaction of Judgment. In this notice,
Plaintiff states that the original December 28, 2015, Judgment has been fully satisfied by The H.C.
Brock Company. The Judgment compelled submission to an audit, the business records of The Brock
Company for the period September 24, 2013 through September 30, 2014. The current action against
Clinton Jeffrey Brock dba The Brock Company also seeks submission to an audit, the business records
of The Brock Company for the exact same time period specified in Brock I and the December 28, 2015,
Judgment.
The facts now contained in the record indicate that the relief Plaintiff seeks by way of the current
action has already been satisfied. Therefore, the Court orders a second Order to Show Cause re
Dismissal. In its response, Plaintiff shall explain what additional records Defendant possesses from the
relevant time period that warrants the filing and litigation of the current action. Plaintiff shall respond in
writing no later than March 30, 2017. The response shall be limited to five pages in length. Failure to
timely and adequately respond will result in dismissal of this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (10/08)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1