In re Mary A. Flowers

Filing 29

ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. WHEREAS Appellant was ordered to show cause in writing by not later than March 14, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution for Appellant's failure to timely file her opening briefs 21 ; WHEREAS the period elapsed without any opening briefs filed by the Appellant or any good cause to warrant an extension; The Court hereby DISMISSES the instant case for lack of prosecution. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)

1
2

JS-6

3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

In re Mary A. Flowers

)
)
Mary A. Flowers,
)
Appellant,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
Schorr Law, A Professional Corporation, )
)
)
)
Appellee.
)
)

NO. CV 16-8014-R
USBC Central District of California Los
Angeles, 2:13-bk-10751-SK;
2:15-ap-1408-SK

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
BY LACK OF PROSECUTION

17
18

On February 3, 2017, a Certificate of Readiness and Completion of Record was issued

19

in this case, setting the opening brief to be filed and served by March 6, 2017. Appellant failed

20

to timely submit her opening brief by March 6, 2017. On March 7, 2017, the Court ORDERED the

21

Appellant to show cause in writing no later than March 14, 2017 why this action should not be

22

dismissed for lack of prosecution. In response to the Order to Show Cause, on March 10, 2017,

23

the Appellant submitted an “Extension of Time to File Brief Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal

24

For Lack of Prosecution Civil Minutes (Reply to)” (Dckt. No. 22) (“Request”) requesting for

25

additional time to file her brief for the reasons as stated in the Appellant’s Request. No good

26

cause was shown, and Appellant’s Request for an extension was DENIED.

27

///

28

///

1

WHEREAS Appellant was ordered to show cause in writing by not later than March 14,

2

2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution for Appellant’s failure to

3

timely file her opening briefs;

4
5
6

WHEREAS the period elapsed without any opening briefs filed by the Appellant or any good
cause to warrant an extension;
The Court hereby DISMISSES the instant case for lack of prosecution.

7
8

Dated: June 8, 2017

9
10

HON. MANUEL L. REAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2