In Re Peter Emanuel Kvassay

Filing 15

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL RE: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/13/2017. (vdr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

CV 16-8015 FMO

Title

In re Peter Emmanuel Kvassay

Present: The Honorable

Date

January 9, 2017

Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge

Vanessa Figueroa

None Present

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None Present

None Present

Proceedings:

(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of
Prosecution

The Notice Regarding Appeal from Bankruptcy Court (Dkt. 5), cautioned that “failure of
either party to comply with time requirements as stated in this notice and applicable rules may
result in the dismissal of the appeal or right to oppose the appeal.” (See id. at 2). Despite this
admonition, the parties have failed to: (1) file the statement of issues pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr.
P. 8010; (2) file the designation of record pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8010; and (3) file a
transcript order notice, which is required whether or not appellant wishes to include a transcript
in the record pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8010, Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(1), and 9th Cir. R. 10-3.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that appellant and cross-appellant shall show cause in writing
on or before January 13, 2017, why the appeals should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of appellant’s and/or crossappellant’s response. Alternatively, if appellant and/or cross-appellant file the statement of issues,
designation of record, and transcript order notice on or before the date indicated above, the court
will consider this a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to file a timely
response to this Order to Show Cause may result in the action being dismissed for lack of
prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the court, pursuant to Local Rule 41. See
also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388
(1962).

00
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (01/13)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

:

00

vdr

Page 1 of 1