Tacori Enterprises v. C. Gonshors Fine Jewelry, Inc.

Filing 24

CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST C. GONSHOR'S FINE JEWELRY, INC. by Judge George H. Wu in favor of Tacori Enterprises against C. Gonshors Fine Jewelry, Inc. (See document for specifics) ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (mrgo)

Download PDF
1 TUCKER ELLIS LLP Howard A. Kroll - SBN 100981 2 howard.kroll@tuckerellis.com 515 South Flower Street 3 Forty-Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2223 213.430.3400 4 Telephone: Facsimile: 213.430.3409 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 TACORI ENTERPRISES JS-6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TUCKER ELLIS LLP Cleveland ♦ Columbus ♦ Denver ♦ Los Angeles ♦ San Francisco 10 11 TACORI ENTERPRISES Case No. 2:16-cv-08134 12 CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST C. GONSHOR’S FINE JEWELRY, INC. 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C. GONSHOR’S FINE JEWELRY, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) Plaintiff Tacori Enterprises (“Tacori”), and Defendant C. Gonshor’s Fine Jewelry, 19 Inc. (“Gonshor”), agree to the entry of this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction 20 against Gonshor. 21 Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows: 22 1. This case is a civil action arising under the Trademark and Copyright the 23 Laws of the United States, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051, et seq. and 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq., 24 respectively. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over these claims under 15 25 U.S.C. § 1121, 17 U.S.C. § 501 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 26 2. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1400(a). 27 3. Tacori is a California corporation with its principal place of business at 1736 28 Gardena Avenue, Glendale, California. 1 4. Gonshor has its principal place of business at 640 So. Hill Street, Room 2 A546, Los Angeles, CA 90014. 3 5. For over 35 years, Tacori has been an innovator in the design, creation, and 4 marketing of fine jewelry. Tacori designs its own jewelry and has created exclusive 5 collections from only top quality platinum and 18 or 22 karat gold. 6 6. Tacori owns United States Trademark Registration No. 3,728,425 (the 7 “TACORI TRADEMARK”) for jewelry which incorporates the same distinctive design 8 as follows: “the appearance of two essentially concentric rings, with one of the rings 9 having a larger diameter than the other. Embedded between the rings are repeating semi- TUCKER ELLIS LLP Cleveland ♦ Columbus ♦ Denver ♦ Los Angeles ♦ San Francisco 10 circles or arcs which appear contiguous to each other. A space is created between the 11 contiguous semi-circles or arcs.” A copy of Trademark Registration No. 3,728,425 is 12 attached to this Judgment as Exhibit A. 13 7. The TACORI TRADEMARK is valid, strong, enforceable and widely 14 known and recognized among jewelers and consumers throughout the United States. 15 8. The TACORI TRADEMARK is unique and distinctive and, as such, 16 designates a single source of origin. 17 9. As a result of Tacori’s extensive and exclusive use, the TACORI 18 TRADEMARK has developed extensive goodwill in the market and is extremely 19 valuable to Tacori. Tacori expends substantial effort and expense to protect the TACORI 20 TRADEMARK and its distinctiveness in the marketplace. 21 10. At all relevant times, Tacori complied in all respects with the Copyright 22 Acts, 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq., and secured the exclusive rights and privileges in and to 23 the copyrights of U.S. Copyright Registrations for the Tacori Crescent Jewelry 24 (collectively the “TACORI COPYRIGHTS”). A list of the TACORI COPYRIGHTS is 25 attached to this Judgment as Exhibit B. 26 11. The TACORI COPYRIGHTS are valid, strong and enforceable. 27 12. Gonshor and Gonshor’s officers, directors, employees, representatives, 28 agents, successors-in-interest, parent corporations, subsidiary corporations, legal entities 2 1 or persons controlled by Gonshor, and all other persons who are in active concert or 2 participation with them, are hereby permanently enjoined from: a. 3 Copying or making unauthorized use of, or engaging in any 4 unauthorized distribution of products protected by the TACORI TRADEMARK or 5 rings that are confusingly similar to the TACORI TRADEMARK; b. 6 Copying or making unauthorized use of, or engaging in any 7 unauthorized distribution of products protected by the TACORI COPYRIGHTS or 8 rings that are substantially similar to the TACORI COPYRIGHTS c. 9 Selling, distributing, advertising, manufacturing or purchasing any TUCKER ELLIS LLP Cleveland ♦ Columbus ♦ Denver ♦ Los Angeles ♦ San Francisco 10 and all variants within Gonshor Ring Style No. 7237 (the “Gonshor Ring”) or any 11 ring substantially similar to the Gonshor Ring; and d. 12 Knowingly assisting, aiding or abetting any other person or business 13 entity in engaging in or performing any of the activities referred to in 14 subparagraphs 12(a) through 12(b) above. 15 13. Within thirty days of the date of this Order, Gonshor shall destroy all of the 16 Gonshor Rings in its possession. 17 14. The parties waive notice of entry of this Consent Judgment and Permanent 18 Injunction and the right to appeal therefrom or to test its validity and consent to its 19 immediate entry in accordance with its terms. This Court expressly retains jurisdiction 20 over this matter to enforce, implement or construe this Consent Judgment and Permanent 21 Injunction. 22 23 SO ORDERED. 24 25 _____________________________ United States District Judge DATED: December 28, 2016 26 27 28 3 1 The individuals executing this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction 2 represent or confirm that they are duly authorized to do so, and are similarly authorized to 3 bind their respective clients to this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction. 4 5 CONSENTED TO: 6 7 8 Dated: December 27, 2016 TUCKER ELLIS, LLP 9 TUCKER ELLIS LLP Cleveland ♦ Columbus ♦ Denver ♦ Los Angeles ♦ San Francisco 10 11 By: 12 13 /s/Howard A. Kroll Howard A. Kroll Attorneys for Plaintiff TACORI ENTERPRISES 14 15 Dated: December 27, 2016 16 LAW OFFICES OF LEON SMALL 17 18 19 20 21 By: /s/Leon Small* Leon Small Attorneys for Defendant C. GONSHOR’S FINE JEWELRY, INC. 22 *Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2), the filing party attests that Defendant’s counsel 23 concurs in the content of this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction and has 24 authorized its filing with his electronic signature. 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?