Liberty Insurance Corporation v. Khaled Almaleh et al

Filing 31

JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Liberty Insurance Corporation against Khaled Almaleh, Robert Nelson, Stephanie Mason: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Liberty and against Defendants K. Almaleh, Stephanie Mason, and Robert Nelson. Liberty had, and has, no duty to defend or indemnify K. Almaleh, or to pay any portion of his defense costs, in an underlying state court lawsuit entitled Stephanie Mason et al. v. Khaled Al Maleh, et al., in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC605894 (the "Underlying Action.") Liberty is entitled to immediately withdraw from the defense of K. Almaleh in the Underlying Action. Liberty is also entitled to reimbursement of $3,428.05 for the defense costs it has incurred to date to defend K. Almaleh in the Underlying Action. The costs are recoverable from K. Almaleh only. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)

1

E-FILED 6/1/17

2

JS-6

3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10 LIBERTY INSURANCE
CORPORATION, an Illinois
11 corporation,
Plaintiff,

12
13

v.

14 KHALED ALMALEH, an individual;
STEPHANIE MASON, an individual;
15 and ROBERT NELSON, an individual,
Defendants.

16

Case No. 2:16-cv-08170-PSG (RAOx)
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Date:
June 19, 2017
Time:
1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 6A
Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez
Complaint Filed: November 2, 2016

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1SMRH:482383148.1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1
2

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
The Court, having granted Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation’s

3 (“Liberty’s”) Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against Defendants Khaled K.
4 Almaleh aka Khaled Al Maleh aka Kal Maleh (collectively, “K. Almaleh”),
5 Stephanie Mason, and Robert Nelson (“Defendants”), and good cause appearing
6 therefore,
7
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is

8

9 hereby entered in favor of Liberty and against Defendants K. Almaleh, Stephanie
10 Mason, and Robert Nelson. Liberty had, and has, no duty to defend or indemnify K.
11 Almaleh, or to pay any portion of his defense costs, in an underlying state court
12 lawsuit entitled Stephanie Mason et al. v. Khaled Al Maleh, et al., in the Superior
13 Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC605894 (the
14 “Underlying Action.”) Liberty is entitled to immediately withdraw from the defense
15 of K. Almaleh in the Underlying Action. Liberty is also entitled to reimbursement
16 of $3,428.05 for the defense costs it has incurred to date to defend K. Almaleh in the
17 Underlying Action.

The costs are recoverable from K. Almaleh only.

18
19
20 Dated: _____________________
5/31/17

______________________________
HON. PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2SMRH:482383148.1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT