Pablo Duran et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
32
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge S. James Otero. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: The First Amended Complaint is dismissed, as to both Wells Fargoand Barrett, as to all causes of action, with prejudice; Judgment is entered in favor of defe ndants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP; and 3. Plaintiffs, Pablo Duran and Maria Duran will recover nothing in this action from either defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. or BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP. (jy)
1
2
3
February 13, 2017
4
VC
P
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
10
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-08510-SJO-GJS
11 PABLO DURAN, an individual;
MARIA DURAN, an individual,
12
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
[Assigned to the Honorable S. James
Otero]
15
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.;
BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER
17 TREDER & WEISS, LLP; and DOES 1
through 20, inclusive,
18
16
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR2095/01660355-1
1
CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-08510-SJO-GJS
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
1
On February 7, 2017, the Court entered an Order granting the Motion to
2 Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, filed by defendant WELLS FARGO
3 BANK, N.A., successor by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a
4 Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”) and
5 joined by Barret Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP (“Barrett”), dismissing the
6 First Amended Complaint in its entirety.
7
Accordingly:
8
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
9
1.
The First Amended Complaint is dismissed, as to both Wells Fargo
10 and Barrett, as to all causes of action, with prejudice;
11
2.
Judgment is entered in favor of defendants WELLS FARGO BANK,
12 N.A. and BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP; and
13
3.
Plaintiffs, Pablo Duran and Maria Duran will recover nothing in this
14 action from either defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. or BARRETT
15 DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP.
16
17
18
19 DATED: 2/13/17
20
HON. S. JAMES OTERO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR2095/01660355-1
2
CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-08510-SJO-GJS
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to
3 this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business
address is Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten, LLP, 301 N. Lake
4 Avenue, Suite 1100, Pasadena, California 91101.
5
On the date below, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled:
6
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
7 on the interested parties in said case as follows:
Served Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Pablo Duran and Marian Duran:
Jack Ter-Saakyan, Esq.
Kenley Dygert, Esq.
JT LEGAL GROUP, APC
801 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 1130
Glendale, CA 91203
Tel.: (818) 745-1594 | Fax: (747) 4442369
Emails: jack@jtfirm.com;
kenley@jtlegalgroup.com
17
Attorneys for Defendant
Barrett Daffin Frappier
Treder & Weiss, LLP:
Edward A. Treder, Esq.
James T. Lee, Esq.
BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER
TREDER & WEISS, LLP
20955 Pathfinder Rd., Suite 300
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Tel.: (626) 915-5714 | Fax: (626) 9150289
Emails: edwardt@bdfgroup.com;
jamesl@bdfgroup.com
18
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
19 America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the
office of a member of the Bar of this Court, at whose direction the service was
20 made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California on February 8, 2017.
21
22
/s/ Lina Velasquez
(Signature of Declarant)
Lina Velasquez
(Type or Print Name)
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR2095/01660355-1
1
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-08510-SJO-GJS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?