Pablo Duran et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 32

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge S. James Otero. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: The First Amended Complaint is dismissed, as to both Wells Fargoand Barrett, as to all causes of action, with prejudice; Judgment is entered in favor of defe ndants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP; and 3. Plaintiffs, Pablo Duran and Maria Duran will recover nothing in this action from either defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. or BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP. (jy)

Download PDF
1 2 3 February 13, 2017 4 VC P 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-08510-SJO-GJS 11 PABLO DURAN, an individual; MARIA DURAN, an individual, 12 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL Plaintiffs, 13 14 v. [Assigned to the Honorable S. James Otero] 15 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER 17 TREDER & WEISS, LLP; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 18 16 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR2095/01660355-1 1 CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-08510-SJO-GJS [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 1 On February 7, 2017, the Court entered an Order granting the Motion to 2 Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, filed by defendant WELLS FARGO 3 BANK, N.A., successor by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a 4 Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”) and 5 joined by Barret Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP (“Barrett”), dismissing the 6 First Amended Complaint in its entirety. 7 Accordingly: 8 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 9 1. The First Amended Complaint is dismissed, as to both Wells Fargo 10 and Barrett, as to all causes of action, with prejudice; 11 2. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, 12 N.A. and BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP; and 13 3. Plaintiffs, Pablo Duran and Maria Duran will recover nothing in this 14 action from either defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. or BARRETT 15 DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP. 16 17 18 19 DATED: 2/13/17 20 HON. S. JAMES OTERO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR2095/01660355-1 2 CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-08510-SJO-GJS [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to 3 this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten, LLP, 301 N. Lake 4 Avenue, Suite 1100, Pasadena, California 91101. 5 On the date below, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled: 6 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 7 on the interested parties in said case as follows: Served Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Pablo Duran and Marian Duran: Jack Ter-Saakyan, Esq. Kenley Dygert, Esq. JT LEGAL GROUP, APC 801 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 1130 Glendale, CA 91203 Tel.: (818) 745-1594 | Fax: (747) 4442369 Emails: jack@jtfirm.com; kenley@jtlegalgroup.com 17 Attorneys for Defendant Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP: Edward A. Treder, Esq. James T. Lee, Esq. BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP 20955 Pathfinder Rd., Suite 300 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Tel.: (626) 915-5714 | Fax: (626) 9150289 Emails: edwardt@bdfgroup.com; jamesl@bdfgroup.com 18 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of 19 America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court, at whose direction the service was 20 made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California on February 8, 2017. 21 22 /s/ Lina Velasquez (Signature of Declarant) Lina Velasquez (Type or Print Name) 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR2095/01660355-1 1 CASE NO. 2:16-CV-08510-SJO-GJS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?