Daniel C. Wildman v. E. Arnold

Filing 29

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Josephine L. Staton for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 26 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) The Motion to Stay (Dkt. 26) is DENIED; (2) Petitioners request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (dv)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 DANIEL C. WILDMAN, 13 Petitioner, 14 15 v. E. ARNOLD, Warden, 16 Respondent. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 16-08570 JLS (JDE) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, 20 Traverse, and Motion to Stay filed by Petitioner, the Answer and Opposition 21 to the Motion to Stay filed by Respondent, the records on file, and the Report 22 and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has 23 24 25 26 27 28 filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) The Motion to Stay (Dkt. 26) is DENIED; (2) Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED; and 1 2 (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. 3 4 Dated: March 6, 2018 ______________________________ JOSEPHINE L. STATON United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?