Daniel C. Wildman v. E. Arnold
Filing
29
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Josephine L. Staton for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 26 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) The Motion to Stay (Dkt. 26) is DENIED; (2) Petitioners request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (dv)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
DANIEL C. WILDMAN,
13
Petitioner,
14
15
v.
E. ARNOLD, Warden,
16
Respondent.
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 16-08570 JLS (JDE)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
18
19
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition,
20
Traverse, and Motion to Stay filed by Petitioner, the Answer and Opposition
21
to the Motion to Stay filed by Respondent, the records on file, and the Report
22
and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has
23
24
25
26
27
28
filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accordingly
accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
(1)
The Motion to Stay (Dkt. 26) is DENIED;
(2)
Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED; and
1
2
(3)
Judgment shall be entered denying the petition and dismissing this
action with prejudice.
3
4
Dated: March 6, 2018
______________________________
JOSEPHINE L. STATON
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?