Henry Chung v. Vaporous Technologies, LLC et al

Filing 68

JUDGMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Accused Products alleged by Plaintiff inthis Action to infringe the 812 Patent do not literally or equivalently infringe the 812 Patent; and Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed with prejudice, and Plaintiff shall take nothing. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12 HENRY CHUNG,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
)
VAPOROUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, )
a Pennsylvania limited
)
liability corporation;
)
CHRISTIAN RADO, an
)
individual; and DOES 1-10, )
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)

CV 16-08586-RSWL-PLA
JUDGMENT

On June 6, 2018, this Court issued its ruling and

23 decision on Plaintiff/Counter Defendant Henry Chung’s
24 (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Dismiss Infringement Action
25 (“Plaintiff’s Motion”) and Defendants/Counter Claimants
26 Vaporous Technologies, LLC and Christian Rado’s
27 (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Partial Summary
28 Judgment as to Non-Infringement of the ‘812 Patent
1

1 (“Defendants’ Motion”).

The Court denied Plaintiff’s

2 Motion and granted Defendants’ Motion.

Subsequently,

3 Defendants voluntarily dismissed their remaining
4 counterclaim for invalidity of the ‘812 Patent.
5 Accordingly, the Court hereby enters Judgment as
6 follows:
7

1.

The Accused Products alleged by Plaintiff in

8 this Action to infringe the ‘812 Patent do not
9 literally or equivalently infringe the ‘812 Patent; and
10

2.

Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed with

11 prejudice, and Plaintiff shall take nothing.
12 IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14 DATED: July 3, 2018

s/ RONALD S.W. LEW

15

HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW
Senior U.S. District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2