Andrew Burkot v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 12

ORDER TO REMAND THE INSTANT CASE TO STATE COURT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES 11 by Judge S. James Otero: Case remanded to LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT, Case number BC 630615. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lc)

JS-6

1 Martin Holly (State Bar No. 201421)

[e-mail]

2 Anthony W. Werbin (State Bar No. 285684)

[e-mail]

January 19, 2017

3 MANNING & KASS

ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP

4 801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor

VC
P

Los Angeles, California 90017-3012

5 Telephone: [phone]

Facsimile: [phone]

6

Attorneys for Defendant,

7 TARGET CORPORATION
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

11
12 ANDREW BURKOT,

Case No. 2:16-cv-08619-SJO-KS

Plaintiff,

13

Assigned to Hon. S. James Otero

v.

14

(State Court Case No. BC630615)

15 TARGET CORPORATION, Does 1 to

ORDER TO REMAND THE
INSTANT CASE TO STATE
COURT PURSUANT TO
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES

10,

16

Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE:
THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL
OF RECORD, have stipulated that Plaintiff Andrew Burkot ("Plaintiff") may
recover no more than Seventy-Four Thousand, Nine Hundred and Ninety-Nine
dollars ($74,999) in damages of any sort from any and all Defendants currently
named or named in the future in this action. The fully executed stipulation is
attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
///
///
1
ORDER

1

Therefore, in light of the attached Stipulation, the parties respectfully request

2 that this Court enter an Order remanding the case to Superior Court.
3
4 DATED: January 19, 2017
5

By:__________________________________
The Honorable S. James Otero

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER