Coach, Inc. et al v. Hollywood Contempo et al
Filing
28
ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 27 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant in the amount of $50,000 with respect to Plaintiffs' claims as set forth in the Complaint filed in the present action (Dkt. 1). (SEE JUDGMENT FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS) (bp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
COACH, INC., a Maryland Corporation; ) CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-08740-JAK (JEMx)
COACH SERVICES, INC., a Maryland )
)
Corporation,
) ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT
) INCLUDING PERMANENT
Plaintiffs,
) INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY
) DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH
v.
) PREJUDICE
)
) JS-6
HOLLYWOOD CONTEMPO, an
unknown business entity; and DOES 1- )
)
10; inclusive
)
)
Defendant.
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
WHEREAS Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and
Hollywood Contempo (“Defendant”) have entered into a Settlement Agreement and
Mutual Release regarding Defendant’s manufacture, distribution, promotion,
advertisement, offering for sale, and/or sale of wallets (“Accused Products”), the
designs of which Coach has alleged infringe upon its Signature C Mark; and
WHEREAS the parties have agreed to settle all of the claims in this action with
respect to the parties to this Consent Judgment; and
WHEREAS Defendant has agreed to consent to this judgment, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT:
28
1
ORDER
1
2
3
1.
This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this Consent Judgment and
has jurisdiction over the subject matter hereof pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1121.
2.
Judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant in
4
the amount of $50,000 with respect to Plaintiffs’ claims as set forth in the Complaint
5
filed in the present action (Dkt. 1).
6
3.
7
Defendant shall not, directly or indirectly:
a.
Manufacture, purchase, produce, distribute, circulate, sell, offer for
8
sale, import, export, advertise, promote, display, ship, market or
9
incorporate in advertising or marketing any Accused Products
10
and/or other non-authentic products bearing marks or features
11
confusingly similar or substantially similar to the Coach
12
Trademarks;
13
b.
14
Deliver, hold for sale, return, transfer or otherwise move, store or
dispose of in any manner any Accused Products;
15
c.
Commit any other acts calculated to cause purchasers to believe
16
that Defendant’s products or a third party’s products are genuine
17
Coach merchandise or associated in any way with Plaintiffs, when
18
they are not authentic Coach products;
19
d.
Engage in any other activity constituting unfair competition with
20
Plaintiffs or that will cause the distinctiveness of the Coach
21
Trademarks to be diluted; or
22
e.
23
24
25
26
Assist, aid or attempt to assist or aid any other person or entity in
performing any of the prohibited activities referred to above.
4.
Plaintiffs and Defendant shall bear their respective costs and attorney’s
fees incurred in connection with this action.
5.
The execution of this Consent Judgment shall serve to bind and obligate
27
the parties to it. However, dismissal with prejudice of this action shall not have
28
preclusive effect on any person not a party to this action or not specifically released in
2
ORDER
1
the parties’ written settlement agreement. Plaintiffs expressly reserve all claims against
2
such part(ies).
3
6.
This Court retains jurisdiction for the purpose of making any further
4
orders necessary or proper for the construction or modification of this Consent
5
Judgment and its enforcement, including through a process that could result in the
6
imposition of penalties for its violation.
7
7.
8
Except as otherwise provided herein, this action is dismissed with
prejudice.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
DATED: September 6, 2017
__________________________
John A. Kronstadt
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?