Vanessa Soltero v. Sodexo, Inc et al
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 29 by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the case Vanessa Soltero v. Sodexo, Inc., et al., Case No. 16-cv-8750-PA (JEMx) is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own respective fees and costs. All pending proceedings are vacated and no further proceedings shall take place in this action. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cr)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
VANESSA SOLTERO, an individual,
Case No. 16-cv-8750-PA (JEMx)
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
SODEXO, INC., a Delaware
corporation; SDH SERVICES WEST,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability
15 company; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
14
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
n for
Dismissal.docx
28
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE [29]
1
The Court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with
2 Prejudice in the above-entitled action;
3
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the case Vanessa Soltero v. Sodexo, Inc.,
4
et al., Case No. 16-cv-8750-PA (JEMx) is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to
5
bear its own respective fees and costs. All pending proceedings are vacated and no
6
further proceedings shall take place in this action.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
Dated: June 12, 2017
________________________________
The Honorable Judge Percy Anderson
United States District Court Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
n for
Dismissal.docx
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?