Vanessa Soltero v. Sodexo, Inc et al

Filing 30

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 29 by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the case Vanessa Soltero v. Sodexo, Inc., et al., Case No. 16-cv-8750-PA (JEMx) is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own respective fees and costs. All pending proceedings are vacated and no further proceedings shall take place in this action. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cr)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 VANESSA SOLTERO, an individual, Case No. 16-cv-8750-PA (JEMx) 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 SODEXO, INC., a Delaware corporation; SDH SERVICES WEST, LLC, a Delaware limited liability 15 company; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 14 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 n for Dismissal.docx 28 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [29] 1 The Court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with 2 Prejudice in the above-entitled action; 3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the case Vanessa Soltero v. Sodexo, Inc., 4 et al., Case No. 16-cv-8750-PA (JEMx) is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to 5 bear its own respective fees and costs. All pending proceedings are vacated and no 6 further proceedings shall take place in this action. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 Dated: June 12, 2017 ________________________________ The Honorable Judge Percy Anderson United States District Court Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 n for Dismissal.docx 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?