Adam Quincy Jones v. Cynthia Entzel et al

Filing 14

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Fernando M. Olguin for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 13 . IT IS ORDERED that:(1) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants in their official capacities are dismissed with prejudic e; (2) Plaintiff is granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint consistent with the Report and Recommendation within 30 days of this Order; (3) Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief [Dkt. 2] is DENIED; and (4) Plaintiff's Writ of Mandamus [Dkt. 10] is DENIED. (ec)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADAM QUINCY JONES, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 2:16-cv-08777-FMO (GJS) Plaintiff v. CYNTHIA ENTZEL, ET AL., Defendants. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all 18 other documents filed in this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United 19 States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). The deadline to file Objections to the Report 20 has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. 21 22 23 24 25 The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants in their official capacities are dismissed with prejudice; (2) Plaintiff is granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint consistent with 26 the Report and Recommendation within 30 days of this Order; 27 (3) Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief [Dkt. 2] is DENIED; and 28 1 (4) Plaintiff’s Writ of Mandamus [Dkt. 10] is DENIED. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 DATE: May 22, 2017 _________/s/_________________________ FERNANDO M. OLGUIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?