Adam Quincy Jones v. Cynthia Entzel et al
Filing
14
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Fernando M. Olguin for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 13 . IT IS ORDERED that:(1) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants in their official capacities are dismissed with prejudic e; (2) Plaintiff is granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint consistent with the Report and Recommendation within 30 days of this Order; (3) Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief [Dkt. 2] is DENIED; and (4) Plaintiff's Writ of Mandamus [Dkt. 10] is DENIED. (ec)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ADAM QUINCY JONES,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 2:16-cv-08777-FMO (GJS)
Plaintiff
v.
CYNTHIA ENTZEL, ET AL.,
Defendants.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
16
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all
18
other documents filed in this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United
19
States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). The deadline to file Objections to the Report
20
has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court.
21
22
23
24
25
The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants in their official capacities are dismissed
with prejudice;
(2) Plaintiff is granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint consistent with
26
the Report and Recommendation within 30 days of this Order;
27
(3) Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief [Dkt. 2] is DENIED; and
28
1
(4) Plaintiff’s Writ of Mandamus [Dkt. 10] is DENIED.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
DATE: May 22, 2017
_________/s/_________________________
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?