Steven Ngo v. Mark Mintz

Filing 19

ORDER Re Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice 18 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorney's fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 ASCENSION LAW GROUP PAMELA TSAO( 266734) 17802 Irvine Blvd. Suite A117 Tustin, CA 92780 PH: 714.783.4220 FAX: 888.505.1033 Pamela.Tsao@ascensionlawgroup.com JS-6 Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVEN NGO 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN NGO, an individual Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 vs. MARK MINTZ, an individual, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:16-cv-08782-MWF-AS ORDER RE STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald presiding] 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-08782-MWF-AS 1 2 3 4 Pursuant to the parties’ “Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice,” and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the abovecaptioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorney’s fees. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED 8 Dated August 29, 2017 9 ________________________________ Judge, United States District Court, Central District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-08782-MWF-AS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?