Craig Coleman v. The Best Service Company et al
Filing
41
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 7/28/2017. (vdr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 16-8823 FMO (MRWx)
Title
Craig Coleman v. The Best Service Co., et al.
Present: The Honorable
Date
July 24, 2017
Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge
Vanessa Figueroa
None Present
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None Present
None Present
Proceedings:
(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions or Dismissal
Pursuant to the Court’s Order of January 18, 2017 (Dkt. 24), the parties were required to
complete a settlement conference before a mediator from the court’s ADR Panel no later than July
19, 2017. (See id. at 18). If the case settled, the parties were required to file a Notice of
Settlement no later than 24 hours after settlement. (See id.). Otherwise, the parties were required
to file a Status Report Re: Settlement no later than 48 hours after the settlement conference was
complete. (See id.).
As of the filing date of this Order, neither a Notice of Settlement nor a Status Report Re:
Settlement has been filed. (See, generally, Dkt.). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, no later
than July 28, 2017, the parties shall show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed
for failure to comply with the Court’s Order of January 18, 2017. Failure to submit a response
to this Order by the deadline set forth above may result in the imposition of sanctions
and/or dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v.
Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962); Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291
F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 909 (2003).
00
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (10/08)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
:
00
vdr
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?