Bernie Unrau v. Amblin Partners LLC et al
Filing
39
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 31 AS UNOPPOSED. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc)
<![CDATA[
O
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
United States District Court
Central District of California
8
9
10
11
BERNIE UNRAU,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
Case № 2:16-cv-08850-ODW (JEM)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
AMBLIN ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
Defendant.
15
16
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
DISMISS [31] AS UNOPPOSED
1
On November 30, 2016, Plaintiff Bernie Unrau filed this copyright
2
infringement action.
3
amended complaint. (ECF No. 9.) On April 17, 2017, Plaintiff filed a second
4
amended complaint.
5
Entertainment Inc. filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and
6
noticed a July 10, 2017 hearing on the motion. (ECF No. 31.) On June 1, 2017,
7
Defendant’s attorney David Russell reminded Plaintiff that his opposition was due
8
twenty-one days before the scheduled hearing on the motion in accord with Central
9
District of California Local Rule 7-9. (See Notice of Non-Opposition, Ex. A, ECF
10
(ECF No. 1.)
On January 18, 2017, Plaintiff filed a first
(ECF No. 29.)
On May 31, 2017, Defendant Amblin
No. 38.)
11
Plaintiff never filed any opposition. On June 23, 2017, four days after the Local
12
Rule 7-9 deadline, the Court issued an order to show cause why Plaintiff’s motion
13
should not be granted under Local Rule 7-12 for lack of opposition. (ECF No. 37.)
14
The Court invited Plaintiff to late file his opposition by June 26, 2017, with a note
15
explaining the reason for his delay. Plaintiff did not do so. (Id.)
16
The Court warned Plaintiff in its order to show cause that his failure to file
17
opposition by June 26, 2017, would ultimately result in the dismissal of this action
18
with prejudice. (Id.) Finding that Plaintiff had due notice of his need to file an
19
opposition and failed to do so, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss as
20
unopposed. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall
21
close the case.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
June 28, 2017
25
26
27
28
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
