Emma Liza Melchor v. Deborah K. Johnson
Filing
7
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge James V. Selna re Amended Report and Recommendation (Issued), 6 . IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1)The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; 2) Judgment b e entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and 3) The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. (kh)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
EMMA LIZA MELCHOR,
Petitioner,
13
14
v.
DEBORAH K. JOHNSON, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. LA CV 16-8899 JVS (JCG)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), and the remaining record, and has
made a de novo determination. No objections to the Report and Recommendation
have been filed.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1.
The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;
2.
Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with
prejudice; and
3.
The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.
Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the
Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Slack v. McDaniel,
1
1
529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of
2
appealability.
3
4
5
6
7
DATED: January 30, 2017
HON. JAMES V. SELNA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?