Roberto Carrillo v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al

Filing 14

JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff shall recover nothing from Defendants, and his claims against Defendants are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. Defendants shall recover costs from Plaintiff as evidenced by a bill of costs. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 CASE CLOSED 5 6 United States District Court Central District of California 7 8 9 10 ROBERTO CARRILLO, Plaintiff, 11 12 v. JUDGMENT 13 WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 14 ASSOCIATION; MORTGAGE 15 ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION 16 SYSTEMS; ENCORE CREDIT 17 CORPORATION; FIDELITY 18 NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 19 COMPANY; FINANCIAL TITLE 20 COMPANY; FINANCIAL DEFAULT 21 SERVICES; FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 22 COMPANY; OPTION ONE 23 MORTGAGE CAPITAL 24 CORPORATION; PREMIER TRUST 25 DEED SERVICES INC.; ALMA 26 CAROLINA ZAMORA; and DOES 1 27 through 10, inclusive, 28 Case № 2:16-cv-08950-ODW (AS) Defendants. 1 On December 2, 2016, Plaintiff Roberto Carrillo filed a complaint against 2 Defendants alleging various claims related to the purported mishandling of his 3 mortgage. (ECF No. 1.) On March 1, 2017, the Court granted Defendants Fidelity 4 National Title Insurance Company and Option One Mortgage Capital Corporation’s 5 motions to dismiss as unopposed. (ECF No. 13.) With Plaintiff having failed to 6 oppose two consecutive motions to dismiss, the Court dismissed the case as to all 7 Defendants. (Id.) 8 It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 9 1. 10 11 Defendants are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice; and 2. 12 13 Plaintiff shall recover nothing from Defendants, and his claims against Defendants shall recover costs from Plaintiff as evidenced by a bill of costs. 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. March 7, 2017 18 19 20 21 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?