Benito Bautista v. Jun Soo Lee et al

Filing 22

ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY LACK OF PROSECUTION AND FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER RE: NOTICE TO COUNSEL by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff/Parties were ordered to show caus in writing by not later than April 24, 2017 why this ac tion should not be dismissed for failure to submit a Joint Report of Early Meeting as ordered in this Court's Order Re: Notice to Counsel; WHEREAS, this period has elapsed without any action by plaintiff/parties. The Court hereby DISMISSES the instant case for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with this Court's Order Re: Notice to Counsel. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (cch)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BENITO BAUTISTA, 12 Plaintiff(s), 13 14 15 v. JUN SOO LEE, et al. 16 17 Defendant(s). 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV-16-9017-R ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY LACK OF PROSECUTION AND FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER RE: NOTICE TO COUNSEL 19 Plaintiff/Parties were ordered to show cause in writing by not later than April 24, 2017 why 20 this action should not be dismissed for failure to submit a Joint Report of Early Meeting as ordered 21 in this Court's Order Re: Notice to Counsel; 22 WHEREAS, this period has elapsed without any action by plaintiff/parties. 23 The Court hereby DISMISSES the instant case for lack of prosecution and for failure to 24 comply with this Court's Order Re: Notice to Counsel. 25 Dated: April 25, 2017 26 27 28 HONORABLE MANUEL L. REAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?