JKL IP Company LLC et al v. Creative Forces Group, Inc. et al
Filing
113
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall:, Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall.In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before October 2, 2017 why this action should not bedismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendants Creative Forces Group, Inc., and Jim Martinson (yl)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
Title
Date
CV 16-09065-CBM (SSx)
August 31, 2017
JKL IP COMPANY, LLC, et al. v. Creative Forces Group, Inc., et al.
Present: The Honorable
CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
V.R. Vallery
None Present
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None Present
None Present
Proceedings:
IN CHAMBERS - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution
Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not
served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within
21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States.)
In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own
motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before October 2, 2017 why this action should not be
dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendants Creative Forces Group, Inc., and Jim Martinson. As an alternative
to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response
to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently:
______
X
______
______
X
______
______
Proof(s) of service of summons and complaint on the defendant(s):
An answer by the following defendant(s): Creative Forces Group, Inc., and Jim Martinson.
In cases removed from State Court, responsive pleadings filed by all defendants;
Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
Plaintiff's request that the clerk enter default judgment or plaintiff's noticed motion for entry of default judgment
pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
It is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing
proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies
promptly upon the default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by this
Court. (Local Rules 7-1 and 7-2).
CV-90 (12/02)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Initials of Deputy Clerk VRV
No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the
filingof a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action
will be dismissed as to defendants Creative Forces Group, Inc., and Jim Martinson if the above-mentioned
document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above.
CV-90 (12/02)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Initials of Deputy Clerk VRV
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?