Urban Textile, Inc. v. Mark-Edwards Apparel Inc. et al

Filing 15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. On December 9, 2016, Plaintiff Urban Textile Inc. filed this lawsuit for copyright infringement. (ECF No. 1.) However, it appears Plaintiff failed to serve Defendants within the Federal Rule of Civi l Procedure 4(m) period. Therefore, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, no later than April 5, 2017, why the Court should not dismiss this case for failure to effect service of process within the Rule 4(m) period. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a proof of service as to each Defendant. Failure to timely respond to this Order may result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice without further warning from the Court. (lom)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

United States District Court
Central District of California

9
10
11
12

URBAN TEXTILE, INC.,
Plaintiff,

13

v.

14
15
16
17
18

Case No. 2:16-CV-09155-ODW(FFM)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

MARK-EDWARDS APPAREL, INC.;
STAGE STORES, INC.; SPECIALTY
RETAILERS, INC.; and DOES 1–10,
inclusive
Defendants.

19
20

///

21

///

22

On December 9, 2016, Plaintiff Urban Textile Inc. filed this lawsuit for

23

copyright infringement. (ECF No. 1.) However, it appears Plaintiff failed to serve

24

Defendants within the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) period.

25

Therefore, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, no later than

26

April 5, 2017, why the Court should not dismiss this case for failure to effect service

27

of process within the Rule 4(m) period. The Court will discharge this Order upon the

28

filing of a proof of service as to each Defendant. Failure to timely respond to this

1

Order may result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice without further

2

warning from the Court.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

March 28, 2017

6
7
8

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2