Paul N. Weinberg v. Dirty World, LLC et al
Filing
44
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, in favor of Dirty World, LLC, Paul N Weinberg against Paul N Weinberg in the principal amount of $0.00, interest in the amount of $0.00, attorneys fees of $0.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $0.00. Defendant Dirty World's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (cr)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
PAUL N. WEINBERG, an individual,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
vs.
Case No: CV 16-9179-GW(PJWx)
JUDGMENT RE: PLAINTIFF’S
INFRINGEMENT CLAIM
DIRTY WORLD, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company; DOES 1–10, inclusive,
13
Defendants.
14
DIRTY WORLD, LLC,
15
Counterclaimant,
16
17
vs.
PAUL N. WEINBERG, an individual,
18
Counterdefendant.
19
This matter having come before the Court on Defendant/Counterclaimant DIRTY
20
WORLD, LLC’s (“Dirty World”) Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Court having
21
reviewing and considered the pleadings and the arguments of counsel, and good cause
22
appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
23
24
25
Defendant Dirty World’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. The Court
finds based on the undisputed evidence presented as follows:
1.)
Based on a review of the four factors of 17 U.S.C. § 107 as applied to the
26
undisputed facts of this case, the Court finds that Dirty World’s use of the
27
image in question was a fair use and thus did not infringe Plaintiff PAUL N.
28
WEINBERG’s (“Weinberg”) exclusive rights.
1
2
3
4
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), the Court finds there is no just reason for
delaying the entry of judgment as to Plaintiff’s claims. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint
is hereby dismissed with prejudice, and Plaintiff is ordered to take nothing therefrom.
Dated: August 16, 2017
5
6
HON. GEORGE H. WU
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?