Paul N. Weinberg v. Dirty World, LLC et al

Filing 44

JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, in favor of Dirty World, LLC, Paul N Weinberg against Paul N Weinberg in the principal amount of $0.00, interest in the amount of $0.00, attorneys fees of $0.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $0.00. Defendant Dirty World's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (cr)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 PAUL N. WEINBERG, an individual, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 vs. Case No: CV 16-9179-GW(PJWx) JUDGMENT RE: PLAINTIFF’S INFRINGEMENT CLAIM DIRTY WORLD, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; DOES 1–10, inclusive, 13 Defendants. 14 DIRTY WORLD, LLC, 15 Counterclaimant, 16 17 vs. PAUL N. WEINBERG, an individual, 18 Counterdefendant. 19 This matter having come before the Court on Defendant/Counterclaimant DIRTY 20 WORLD, LLC’s (“Dirty World”) Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Court having 21 reviewing and considered the pleadings and the arguments of counsel, and good cause 22 appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 23 24 25 Defendant Dirty World’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. The Court finds based on the undisputed evidence presented as follows: 1.) Based on a review of the four factors of 17 U.S.C. § 107 as applied to the 26 undisputed facts of this case, the Court finds that Dirty World’s use of the 27 image in question was a fair use and thus did not infringe Plaintiff PAUL N. 28 WEINBERG’s (“Weinberg”) exclusive rights. 1 2 3 4 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), the Court finds there is no just reason for delaying the entry of judgment as to Plaintiff’s claims. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice, and Plaintiff is ordered to take nothing therefrom. Dated: August 16, 2017 5 6 HON. GEORGE H. WU United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?