Serafin Mendez v. Selene Finance LP et al

Filing 60

JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Serafin Mendez shall recover nothing from Defendants; and 2. Plaintiff Serafin Mendez Second Amended Complaint is dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. JS-6. (jp)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11

SERAFIN MENDEZ,
Plaintiff,

12

v.

13
14

Case № 2:16-cv-09335-ODW-FFM
JUDGMENT

SELENE FINANCE LP; THE WOLF
FIRM; and DOES 1–100, inclusive,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On November 17, 2016, Plaintiff Serafin Mendez filed this action in Los

18

Angeles Superior Court. (ECF No. 1-1.) Defendant Selene Finance LP subsequently

19

removed the case to federal court, and moved for summary judgment on all of

20

Plaintiff’s claims. (ECF Nos. 1, 50.) Defendant M&T Bank joined in the Motion.

21

(ECF No. 57.) The Court granted Selene’s Motion for Summary Judgment in full.

22

(ECF No. 59.)

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1

///

2

///

3

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

4

1.

Plaintiff Serafin Mendez shall recover nothing from Defendants; and

5

2.

Plaintiff Serafin Mendez’s Second Amended Complaint is dismissed on

6

the merits and with prejudice.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

March 12, 2018

11
12
13
14

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2