James Unice v. Vizio, Inc.

Filing 27

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT VIZIO, INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 9(b) AND 12(b)(6) by Judge James V. Selna, Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JS-6 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 ANDREW SCHWARTZ and JAMES UNICE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, Case No. 8:16-cv-01883-JVS-DFM Consolidated with Case No. 2:16-cv-09367-JVS-DFM [Assigned to Hon. James V. Selna] v. VIZIO, INC., Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT VIZIO, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 9(b) AND 12(b)(6) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT VIZIO, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS 1 On August 21, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 10C of the Ronald Reagan 2 Federal Building and United States Courthouse for the Central District of California, 3 located at 411 W. Fourth St., Santa Ana, CA 92701, Defendant Vizio, Inc.’s Motion to 4 Dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (“SCAC”) came on for hearing 5 before this Court. The parties appeared through their counsel of record. 6 After considering all of the papers filed herein, the authorities submitted by 7 counsel, as well as counsel’s oral arguments, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the 8 Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ CAC is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 Dated: August 24, 2017 ____________________________ HON. JAMES V. SELNA United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT VIZIO, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?