Andres Gomez v. Jack In The Box Inc et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/20/2017. (rfi)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL
Case No.: 2:16−cv−09405−BRO−SS
Title: ANDRES GOMEZ V. JACK IN THE BOX INC ET AL
Present: The Honorable
BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL
Deputy Clerk: Renee Fisher
Court Reporter/Recorder: None
Tape No.: N/A
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for
lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to
dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In this matter:
Defendant(s) did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have not requested entry of
default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) may satisfy this order by seeking entry
of default, by dismissing the complaint, or by filing a declaration regarding the status of the
case. Plaintiff(s) must provide the Court with a chambers copy of any declaration filed in
connection with this Order to Show Case, pursuant to the Courts Standing Order.
Plaintiffs must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC
will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Deputy Clerk: rfi
− CIVIL MINUTES−GENERAL −
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?