Andres Gomez v. Jack In The Box Inc et al

Filing 15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/17/2017. (rfi)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL
Case No.: 2:16−cv−09405−BRO−SS
Title: ANDRES GOMEZ V. JACK IN THE BOX INC ET AL
Present: The Honorable

Date:

4/26/2017

BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL

Deputy Clerk: Renee Fisher
Court Reporter/Recorder: None
Tape No.: N/A
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
None
Proceedings:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None

(In Chambers)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for
lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to
dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In this matter:
Plaintiff(s) obtained entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), but Plaintiff(s)
have not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy
this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will
not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter.
Plaintiffs must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC
will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Deputy Clerk: rfi

CV−90 (06/04)

− CIVIL MINUTES−GENERAL −

Page 1 of 1