Andres Gomez v. Jack In The Box Inc et al

Filing 15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/17/2017. (rfi)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL Case No.: 2:16−cv−09405−BRO−SS Title: ANDRES GOMEZ V. JACK IN THE BOX INC ET AL Present: The Honorable Date: 4/26/2017 BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL Deputy Clerk: Renee Fisher Court Reporter/Recorder: None Tape No.: N/A Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: None Proceedings: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In this matter: Plaintiff(s) obtained entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), but Plaintiff(s) have not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter. Plaintiffs must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Initials of Deputy Clerk: rfi CV−90 (06/04) − CIVIL MINUTES−GENERAL − Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?