United States of America v. Real Property Located in Los Angeles, California

Filing 16

CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiff United States of America and Eduardo Daniel Sanchez Aguilar ("Sanchez") have reached an agreement that is dispositive of the action. Sanchez waives all appeal rights wit h respect to this matter. The United States of America shall have judgment as to the defendant property, and no other person or entity shall have any right, title or interest therein. Title having vested in plaintiff United States of America, the Uni ted States of America shall proceed to dispose of the defendant property in accordance with law. Each party shall bear its own attorney fees and costs. This Judgment of Forfeiture is binding upon Sanchez and his successors and assigns. See document as to the priority of the proceeds of sale and other details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 [PROPOSED] CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, 18 No. CV 16-09430-CAS (AGRx) Defendant. 19 20 21 22 This matter was commenced on December 21, 2016 against the Real Property 23 Located in Los Angeles, California (the “defendant property”). Title to the defendant 24 property is in the name of Eduardo Daniel Sanchez Aguilar, a single man. 25 No parties have filed claims of interest or answers in this case and the time for 26 filing claims and answers has expired. After the Clerk entered Default against the 27 interests of Eduardo Daniel Sanchez Aguilar (“Sanchez”) and all other potential 28 claimants on April 19, 2017 [Dkt. No. 13], titleholder Sanchez agreed to this Proposed 1 Consent Judgment that alleviates the need for Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment to 2 be decided by the Court [Dkt. No. 14]. 3 Plaintiff United States of America and Sanchez have reached an agreement that is 4 dispositive of the action. Each of the signatories of this Consent Judgment of Forfeiture 5 (“Consent Judgment”) represents that he or she has the full power and authority (without 6 further approvals or consents) to enter into this Consent Judgment and perform the 7 obligations set forth herein. This Consent Judgment may be signed in counterparts and 8 shall be deemed to have been equally drafted by the parties hereto. 9 Sanchez waives all appeal rights with respect to this matter. If Sanchez submitted 10 a petition for remission to the defendant property in any proceedings, he hereby 11 stipulates to withdraw the petition, and waive any right he may have to seek remission or 12 mitigation of the forfeiture described herein. 13 The parties waive the requirements of Local Rule 5.2-1 in order to effectuate this 14 Consent Judgment. The defendant property is located at 1664 Hi Point Street, Los 15 Angeles, California 90035 with Assessor’s Parcel Number 5068-019-015. The legal 16 description of the defendant property is: 17 18 19 20 21 22 The real property in the City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, State of California, described as: LOT 41 OF TRACT NO 3909, IN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 44 PAGE 82 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPT THE EAST 50 FEET THEREOF. 23 24 ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20 FEET THEREOF, AS GRANTED TO THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, FOR STREET PURPOSES. 25 26 Sanchez represents that he and any other occupants have already vacated the 27 defendant property and their personal property has been removed from the defendant 28 property. The parties hereby request that the Court enter this Consent Judgment. 2 1 2 3 4 WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action. 2. Notice of this action has been given in accordance with law. Sanchez is 5 relieved of filing a claim and answer in this matter. All potential claimants to the 6 defendant property, except for Sanchez, are deemed to have admitted the allegations of the 7 Complaint. The allegations set out in the Complaint are sufficient to establish a basis for 8 forfeiture. 9 10 11 3. The United States of America shall have judgment as to the defendant property, and no other person or entity shall have any right, title or interest therein. 4. With respect to the defendant property, the Los Angeles County Recorder 12 shall index this judgment in the grantor index under the name of Eduardo Daniel Sanchez 13 Aguilar and in the grantee index under the name of the United States of America. 14 5. Title having vested in plaintiff United States of America, the United States of 15 America shall proceed to dispose of the defendant property in accordance with law. Upon 16 disposition of the defendant property, the proceeds of the sale of the defendant property, to 17 the extent such amounts are available, shall be payable in the following priority: 18 a. First, payment to the United States Marshals Service for all expenses 19 of forfeiture of the defendant property including, but not limited to, expenses of custody, 20 advertising and sale; 21 b. Second, payment to the County Assessor and Tax Collector of Los 22 Angeles County, California for any unpaid real property taxes assessed against the 23 defendant property up to the date of entry of this Consent Judgment of Forfeiture; and, 24 25 26 c. Third, the United States Marshals Service shall deposit and dispose of the remaining proceeds from the sale of the defendant in accordance with law. 6. The parties shall execute further documents, to the extent necessary, to 27 convey clear title to the defendant property to Plaintiff and to further implement the terms 28 of this Judgment of Forfeiture. 3 1 2 3 4 5 7. The Court will retain jurisdiction to resolve any issues with respect to the parties’ performance under this Judgment of Forfeiture. 8. Each party shall bear its own attorney fees and costs. This Judgment of Forfeiture is binding upon Sanchez and his successors and assigns. 9. Sanchez has agreed to release and hold harmless the United States, its 6 agencies, agents, officers, employees and representatives, including, without limitation, all 7 agents, officers, employees and representatives of the Drug Enforcement Administration, 8 as well as all agents, officers, employees and representatives of any state or local 9 government or law enforcement agency involved in the investigation of this matter, from 10 any and all claims, including claims for interest, actions or causes of action, damages, 11 expenses, and costs, known and unknown, which may hereafter be asserted or brought by 12 or on behalf of Sanchez, arising out of the seizure and/or forfeiture of the defendant 13 property and the institution of this matter. 14 10. The Court finds that there was reasonable cause for the institution of these 15 proceedings. This judgment shall be construed as a certificate of reasonable cause 16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 May 9 2017 DATE HONORABLE CHRISTINA A. SNYDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 SIGNATURE OF PARTIES ARE ON NEXT PAGE 24 25 26 27 28 4 1 Approved as to Form and Content: 2 DATED: May 8, 2017 3 4 5 6 7 8 SANDRA R. BROWN Acting United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division STEVEN R. WELK Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section /S/ KATHARINE SCHONBACHLER Assistant United States Attorney 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 11 12 13 14 DATED: May 4, 2017 /S/ GERARDO A. GONZALEZ, ESQ. 15 16 Attorney for Titleholder EDUARDO DANIEL SANCHEZ AGUILAR 17 18 19 20 21 DATED: May 4 2017 /S/ EDUARDO DANIEL SANCHEZ AGUILAR Titleholder 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?