aPriori Technologies, Inc. v. Charles Jerome Broquard et al

Filing 131

ORDER OF JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AS TO DEFENDANT CHARLES JEROME BROQUARD filed by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (ah)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WESTERN DIVISION

11

aPRIORI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
a Delaware Corporation,

12
13

Plaintiff,
v.

14
15

CHARLES JEROME BROQUARD
and REID DOUGLAS FIELD,

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-09561-JAK-KS

ORDER OF JUDGMENT AND
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AS TO
DEFENDANT CHARLES JEROME
BROQUARD
JS-6 AS TO BROQUARD

16
17

Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Based on the Final Report and Recommendation of Judge Karen L.
Stevenson, which has been approved and adopted, the relief requested by aPriori
Technologies, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) against Charles Jerome Broquard (“Broquard”),

1
2

including the equitable relief set forth in this judgment, is proper and necessary.
Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

3
4
5

1.

Judgment against Broquard is entered in Plaintiff’s favor on the

defamation claim advanced in Count I of the First Amended Complaint;

6

2.

Judgment against Broquard is entered in Plaintiff’s favor on the

7
8

intentional interference with prospective economic advantage claim advanced in

9

Count II of the First Amended Complaint;

10
11
12
13

3.

Judgment against Broquard is entered in Plaintiff’s favor on the

extortion claim advanced in Count III of the First Amended Complaint;
4.

As provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), Broquard,

14
15

and those acting at his specific direction or under his specific control with respect to

16

actions that are enjoined by this judgment, and who have received actual notice of

17

this judgment by personal service, are permanently restrained and enjoined from:

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

a. Making any statement that refers to both aPriori or its officers, customers,
investors, or affiliates, and Mr. Frank Iacovelli with respect to his alleged
acts of child endangerment, child abuse or child molestation.
b. Making any statement that refers to both aPriori or its officers, customers,
investors, or affiliates, and child endangerment, child abuse, or child
molestation on the websites www.frankjosephiacovelli.com,
www.badbadfrank.com, or any similar website created or controlled by
Broquard.
c. E-mailing any customer of aPriori, or any entity or person that Broquard
knows, or has a reasonable basis to know, is a customer of aPriori, about
Mr. Iacovelli regarding child endangerment, child abuse or child
molestation.

28
-2-

1

4

d. Protesting, picketing, or displaying any signs referring to Mr. Iacovelli as
a participant in actions that constitute child endangerment, child abuse or
child molestation within 500 feet of any office or business facility that
Broquard knows, or has a reasonable basis to know, is a business location
of an aPriori customer.

5

There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal

2
3

6

Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this judgment forthwith and
7
8

without further notice.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 22, 2017
___________________________
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-