aPriori Technologies, Inc. v. Charles Jerome Broquard et al

Filing 176

ORDER OF JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AS TO DEFENDANT REID DOUGLAS FIELD by Judge John A. Kronstadt, it is hereby ORDERED,ADJUDGED AND DECREED that (1) Judgment against Field is entered in Plaintiff favor on the defamation claim advanced in Count I of the First Amended Complaint; (2) Judgment against Field is entered in Plaintiff favor on the intentional interference with prospective economic advantage claim advanced in Count II ofthe First Amended Complaint; (3) Judgment against Field is entered in Plaintiffs favor on the extortion claim advanced in Count III of the First Amended Complaint; (4) As provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), Field, and those acting at his specific direction or under his specific control with respect to actions that are enjoined by this judgment, and who have received actual notice of this judgment by personal service, electronic mail, or overnight delivery, are permanently restrained and enjoined. (jp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10

WESTERN DIVISION
11
12

aPRIORI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
a Delaware Corporation,

13

Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17

v.
CHARLES JEROME BROQUARD
and REID DOUGLAS FIELD,

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-09561-JAK-KS
ORDER OF JUDGMENT AND
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AS TO
DEFENDANT REID DOUGLAS
FIELD
JS-6: Douglas Field Only

Defendants.

18
19

Based on the Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions

20

Against Defendant Field, the relief requested by aPriori Technologies, Inc.
21
22

(“Plaintiff”) against Reid Douglas Field (“Field”), including the equitable relief set

23

forth in this judgment, is proper and necessary. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED,

24
25
26
27
28

ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1
2

1.

Judgment against Field is entered in Plaintiff’s favor on the defamation

claim advanced in Count I of the First Amended Complaint;

3
4
5

2.

Judgment against Field is entered in Plaintiff’s favor on the intentional

interference with prospective economic advantage claim advanced in Count II of

6

the First Amended Complaint;
7
8
9

3.

Judgment against Field is entered in Plaintiff’s favor on the extortion

claim advanced in Count III of the First Amended Complaint;

10
11

4.

As provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), Field, and

12

those acting at his specific direction or under his specific control with respect to

13

actions that are enjoined by this judgment, and who have received actual notice of

14
15
16
17
18
19

this judgment by personal service, electronic mail, or overnight delivery, are
permanently restrained and enjoined from:
a. Making any statement that refers to both aPriori or its officers,
customers, investors, or affiliates, and Mr. Frank Iacovelli with
respect to his alleged acts of child endangerment, child abuse or
child molestation.

20
21
22
23

b. Making any statement that refers to both aPriori or its officers,
customers, investors, or affiliates, and child endangerment, child
abuse, or child molestation on the websites
www.frankjosephiacovelli.com, www.badbadfrank.com, or any
similar website created or controlled by Field.

24
25
26
27

c. E-mailing any customer of aPriori, or any entity or person that Field
knows, or has a reasonable basis to know, is a customer of aPriori,
about Mr. Iacovelli regarding child endangerment, child abuse or
child molestation.

28
-2-

1
2
3
4
5

d. Protesting, picketing, or displaying any signs referring to Mr.
Iacovelli as a participant in actions that constitute child
endangerment, child abuse or child molestation within 500 feet of
any office or business facility that Field knows, or has a reasonable
basis to know, is a business location of an aPriori customer.
There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal

6

Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this judgment forthwith and
7
8

without further notice.

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12
13

Dated: February 7, 2018

___________________________
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-