Martha L. Alvarez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 32

JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real: On 8/14/2017, the Court issued an Order granting the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB ("Wells Fargo") to the First Amended Complaint 28 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: (1) The First Amended Complaint is hereby dismissed as to Wells Fargo, without leave to amend; (2) Judgment is entered in favor of d efendant Wells Fargo and against plaintiffs Francisco Alvarez and Martha L. Alvarez on the First Amended Complaint and all causes of action alleged therein; (3) Plaintiffs shall take and recover nothing in this action from defendant Wells Fargo; and (4) As the prevailing party, Wells Fargo shall be entitled to file motions to tax costs and for attorneys' fees. (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANCISCO ALVAREZ; and MARTHA L. ALVAREZ, 12 13 14 CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-09570-R-JEM JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, [The Honorable Manuel L. Real] vs. 15 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; NBS DEFAULT SERVICES, LLC, DOES 17 1 THRU 10, 16 18 Defendants 19 20 21 22 On August 14, 2017, the Court issued an Order (Dkt. 28) granting the 23 Motion to Dismiss of Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor by 24 merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, 25 f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”) to the First Amended Complaint. 26 Accordingly: 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 28 1. The First Amended Complaint is hereby dismissed as to Wells Fargo, 93000/FR2143/01828375-1 1 CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-09570-R-JEM JUDGMENT GRANTING WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S MOTION 1 without leave to amend; 2 2. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Wells Fargo and against 3 plaintiffs Francisco Alvarez and Martha L. Alvarez on the First Amended 4 Complaint and all causes of action alleged therein; 5 3. Plaintiffs shall take and recover nothing in this action from defendant 6 Wells Fargo; and 7 4. As the prevailing party, Wells Fargo shall be entitled to file motions 8 to tax costs and for attorneys’ fees. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 DATED: August 31, 2017 HONORABLE MANUEL L. REAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR2143/01828375-1 2 CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-09570-R-JEM JUDGMENT GRANTING WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S MOTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR2143/01828375-1 CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-09570-R-JEM CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?