Michael Black v. C Chin, et al

Filing 25

MINUTES (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 10, 2017, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the required fee. Receipt of the partial $5.00 filing fee by the Court on or before October 10, 2017, shall be deemed compliance with this Order to Show Cause. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (ch)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL Case No.: CV 17-126-CAS (PLA) Title: Date: September 7, 2017 Michael Black v. C. Chin, et al. PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PAUL L. ABRAMS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE N/A Court Reporter / Recorder Christianna Howard Deputy Clerk ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE PROCEEDINGS: N/A Tape No. NONE (IN CHAMBERS) On January 10, 2017, the Court granted plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, and ordered plaintiff to pay the initial partial filing fee of $5.00 within thirty days of that Order, and submit monthly payments thereafter. (ECF No. 7). On April 11, 2017, the Court granted plaintiff an extension of time to June 12, 2017, to pay his initial partial filing fee. (ECF No. 16). On June 7, 2017, the Court, again, granted plaintiff an extension of time to August 21, 2017, to pay his initial partial filing fee (ECF No. 20). The $5.00 partial filing fee has not been received by the Court. Accordingly, no later than October 10, 2017, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the required fee. Receipt of the partial $5.00 filing fee by the Court on or before October 10, 2017, shall be deemed compliance with this Order to Show Cause. cc: Michael Black, pro se Initials of Deputy Clerk CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL ch Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?