Hangzhou China Textile Import and Export Co., Ltd. v. Playhut, Inc., et al
Filing
36
JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Hangzhou China Textile Import and Export Co., Ltd. against Playhut, Inc.: 1. Plaintiff HANGZHOU CHINA TEXTILE IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., shall recover from defendant PLAYHUT, INC., the principal amount of $1,713,017.02. 2. Plaintiff HANGZHOU CHINA TEXTILE IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., shall recover pre-judgment interest from defendant PLAYHUT, INC., at a rate of 10% per annum, for the period from April 29, 2015, through April 4, 2018, in the amount of $502,641.43, and for the period from April 5, 2018 through April 9, 2018, in the amount of $2,346.60. Plaintiff HANGZHOU CHINA TEXTILE IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., shall also recover its Los Angeles Superior Court filing fee in the amount of $435. 3. Therefore, judgment is hereby awarded in favor of plaintiff HANGZHOU CHINA TEXTILE IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., against defendant PLAYHUT, INC., including pre-judgment interest and costs, in the total amount of $2,218,440.05. (bm)
E-FILED- 4/11/18
1 The Law Offices of Steven P. Scandura
STEVEN P. SCANDURA, ESQ. (SBN 153796)
2 1601 N. Sepulveda Bl., #730
3 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Tel: (310) 473-6300 Fax: (310) 626-9780
4 Email: sps401@gmail.com
5 Attorney for Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant,
6 HANGZHOU CHINA TEXTILE IMPORT
& EXPORT CO., LTD.
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Western Division - Los Angeles
11 HANGZHOU CHINA TEXTILE
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00157-PSG-GJS
12
JUDGMENT [PROPOSED]
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
)
IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., )
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
PLAYHUT, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
______________________________ )
)
)
PLAYHUT, INC.,
)
)
Counter-Claimant,
)
vs.
)
)
HANGZHOU CHINA TEXTILE
IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., )
)
)
Counter-Defendant.
______________________________ )
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
April 9, 2018
1:30 p.m.
6A
Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez
JUDGMENT
In accordance with Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the
24 Motion for Summary Judgment by plaintiff HANGZHOU CHINA TEXTILE
25 IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., against defendant PLAYHUT, INC., came
26 before the Court, the Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, presiding. The Court, having
27 considered all of the evidence and arguments presented by the parties with regard
28 to the Motion for Summary Judgment, the Memorandum of Points and
Judgment
-1-
1 Authorities, Plaintiff’s Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of
2 Law, the Declarations of Yu Jia Jiang and Steven P. Scandura, the Exhibits
3 thereto, and the other documents filed in support of the Motion for Summary
4 Judgment, finds that no triable issue of material fact exists, grants the motion, and
5 awards judgment as follows:
6
1.
Plaintiff HANGZHOU CHINA TEXTILE IMPORT AND EXPORT
7 CO., LTD., shall recover from defendant PLAYHUT, INC., the principal amount
8 of $1,713,017.02.
9
2.
Plaintiff HANGZHOU CHINA TEXTILE IMPORT AND EXPORT
10 CO., LTD., shall recover pre-judgment interest from defendant PLAYHUT, INC.,
11 at a rate of 10% per annum, for the period from April 29, 2015, through April 4,
12 2018, in the amount of $502,641.43, and for the period from April 5, 2018
13 through April 9, 2018, in the amount of $2,346.60. Plaintiff HANGZHOU
14 CHINA TEXTILE IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., shall also recover its
15 Los Angeles Superior Court filing fee in the amount of $435.
16
3.
Therefore, judgment is hereby awarded in favor of plaintiff
17 HANGZHOU CHINA TEXTILE IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., against
18 defendant PLAYHUT, INC., including pre-judgment interest and costs, in the
19 total amount of $2,218,440.05.
20
21 IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
4/11/18
23 Dated: ____________________
_____________________________
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_____________________________
S
The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
Judgment
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?