Microsoft Corporation v. M. Media et al
Filing
85
ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 83 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Pursuant to the stipulation, Defendants Sheng Ti Leung, Wayne Leung, and Mig Jeug Wo are hereby dismissed with prejudice from Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation's Complaint, wi th each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The above-captioned action, including all claims asserted therein, is dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to the Permanent Injunction entered by this Court. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
1
2
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a
Washington corporation
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 2:17-cv-00347-MWF
ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
M. MEDIA, a business entity of
unknown form d/b/a METRO MEDIA,
METRO MEDIA USA, and/or
QUINMART and/or f/k/a LA METRO
MEDIA INC.; SHENG TI LEUNG, an
individual; WAYNE LEUNG, an
individual; MIG JEUG WO, an
individual; and DOES 1-3,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore,
23
Defendants Sheng Ti Leung, Wayne Leung, and Mig Jeug Wo are hereby dismissed
24
with prejudice from Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation’s Complaint, with each party to
25
bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. The above-captioned action, including all
26
claims asserted therein, is dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of
27
Civil Procedure.
28
139755789.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
This Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to the Permanent Injunction
entered by this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 9, 2018
7
_______________________________
HON. MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
139755789.1
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?