Brandon Favor v. Maxine Anderson
Filing
2
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/19/2017. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T) [Transferred from California Eastern on 1/20/2017.]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRANDON FAVOR,
12
13
14
1:17-cv-00028-JLT (HC)
Petitioner,
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
v.
MAXINE ANDERSON,
15
Respondent.
16
17
18
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a habeas corpus action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. ' 2254.
19
The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity
20
jurisdiction, be brought only in A(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all
21
defendants reside in the same state, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events
22
or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the
23
subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if
24
there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.@ 28 U.S.C. ' 1391(b).
25
In this case, the petitioner is challenging a conviction from Los Angeles County, which is
26
in the Central District of California. Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the United
27
States District Court for the Central District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal
28
court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. '
1
1
2
3
1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this matter is transferred to the United States
District Court for the Central District of California.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 19, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?