Otto Randle v. JPMorgan Chase et al

Filing 19

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than January 3, 2018, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. REFER TO THE COURT'S ORDER FOR DETAILS. (pso)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.

LA CV17-00564 JAK (PLAx)

Title

Otto Randle v. JPMorgan Chase, et al.

Present: The Honorable

Date

December 19, 2017

JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Paul Songco for Andrea Keifer

Not Reported

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK
OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than January 3, 2018, why
this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In the absence of showing good cause, a
matter shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served within 90 days after the
filing of the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). An action may be dismissed prior to such time if
the Plaintiff fails to diligently prosecute the action.
The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral
argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will
consider the filing of a responsive pleading to the complaint and/or proof(s) of service, which indicates
proper service in full compliance with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is
due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

:
Initials of Preparer

ps

Page 1 of 1