Jose Rosas v. Dean Borders
Filing
23
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the First Amended Petition with prejudice. (See Order for complete details) (afe)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
10
JOSE ROSAS,
11
Petitioner,
12
v.
13
DEAN BORDERS,
14
Respondent.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. CV 17-00665-JAK(AS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the
Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Final Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.
After having made a
de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation
to which objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts
the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the
First Amended Petition with prejudice.
///
///
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order,
2
the Magistrate Judge’s Final Report and Recommendation and the Judgment
3
herein on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.
4
5
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
6
7
DATED: September 22, 2017
8
9
10
11
___________________________________
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?