Joe Ledesma v. Target Corporation et al
Filing
9
ORDER TO REMAND THE INSTANT CASE TO STATE COURT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 8 BY THE PARTIES by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Stipulation is GRANTED for the reasons set forth therein. This matter is hereby remanded to the Los Angeles Superior Court. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
1 Martin Holly (State Bar No. 201421)
mdh@manningllp.com
2 Anthony Werbin (State Bar No. 285684)
aww@manningllp.com
3 MANNING & KASS
ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
4 801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-3012
5 Telephone: (213) 624-6900
Facsimile: (213) 624-6999
JS-6
6
Attorneys for Defendant, TARGET
7 CORPORATION
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
10
11 JOE LEDESMA,
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 2:17-cv-673 FMO (GJSx)
ORDER TO REMAND THE
INSTANT CASE TO STATE
COURT PURSUANT TO
STIPULATION [8] BY THE
PARTIES
v.
14 TARGET CORPORATION and DOES
1 to 20, Inclusive,,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
The Joint Stipulation of Defendant TARGET CORPORATION and Plaintiff
JOE LEDESMA, to cap damages at $74,999.00 and remand to the Los Angeles
20
21 County Superior Court has been fully considered by the Court and IT IS HEREBY
22 ORDERED THAT the Stipulation is GRANTED for the reasons set forth therein.
23
This matter is hereby remanded to the Los Angeles Superior Court.
24
25 Dated: February 22, 2017
___________/s/_____________
Fernando M. Olguin
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
ORDER TO REMAND TO STATE COURT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?