Joe Ledesma v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 9

ORDER TO REMAND THE INSTANT CASE TO STATE COURT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 8 BY THE PARTIES by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Stipulation is GRANTED for the reasons set forth therein. This matter is hereby remanded to the Los Angeles Superior Court. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 Martin Holly (State Bar No. 201421) mdh@manningllp.com 2 Anthony Werbin (State Bar No. 285684) aww@manningllp.com 3 MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP 4 801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-3012 5 Telephone: (213) 624-6900 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999 JS-6 6 Attorneys for Defendant, TARGET 7 CORPORATION 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 JOE LEDESMA, Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 2:17-cv-673 FMO (GJSx) ORDER TO REMAND THE INSTANT CASE TO STATE COURT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION [8] BY THE PARTIES v. 14 TARGET CORPORATION and DOES 1 to 20, Inclusive,, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 The Joint Stipulation of Defendant TARGET CORPORATION and Plaintiff JOE LEDESMA, to cap damages at $74,999.00 and remand to the Los Angeles 20 21 County Superior Court has been fully considered by the Court and IT IS HEREBY 22 ORDERED THAT the Stipulation is GRANTED for the reasons set forth therein. 23 This matter is hereby remanded to the Los Angeles Superior Court. 24 25 Dated: February 22, 2017 ___________/s/_____________ Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 ORDER TO REMAND TO STATE COURT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?