Joel D. Joseph v. City of Santa Monica, California
Filing
39
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff Joel D. Joseph shall recover nothing from Defendant City of Santa Monica, California. Plaintiff Joel D. Josephs Complaint is dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. (lc)
JS-6
1
CASE CLOSED
2
3
4
5
6
7
United States District Court
Central District of California
8
9
10
11
JOEL D. JOSEPH,
Case № 2:17-cv-00723-ODW-AFM
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
CITY OF SANTA MONICA,
15
JUDGMENT
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On January 30, 2017, Plaintiff filed this action against Defendant alleging
employment discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of
1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621–634. (ECF No. 1.) On February 9, 2018, the Court granted
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and denied Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 31.) On April 9, 2018, the Court denied Plaintiff’s
Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment. (ECF No. 38.)
///
///
///
///
///
///
1
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
2
1.
3
4
5
Plaintiff Joel D. Joseph shall recover nothing from Defendant City of
Santa Monica, California; and
2.
Plaintiff Joel D. Joseph’s Complaint is dismissed on the merits and with
prejudice.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
April 9, 2018
10
11
12
13
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?