Joel D. Joseph v. City of Santa Monica, California

Filing 39

JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff Joel D. Joseph shall recover nothing from Defendant City of Santa Monica, California. Plaintiff Joel D. Josephs Complaint is dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. (lc)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 CASE CLOSED 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court Central District of California 8 9 10 11 JOEL D. JOSEPH, Case № 2:17-cv-00723-ODW-AFM Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 CITY OF SANTA MONICA, 15 JUDGMENT Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On January 30, 2017, Plaintiff filed this action against Defendant alleging employment discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621–634. (ECF No. 1.) On February 9, 2018, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and denied Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 31.) On April 9, 2018, the Court denied Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 38.) /// /// /// /// /// /// 1 It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 2 1. 3 4 5 Plaintiff Joel D. Joseph shall recover nothing from Defendant City of Santa Monica, California; and 2. Plaintiff Joel D. Joseph’s Complaint is dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 April 9, 2018 10 11 12 13 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?