Abdol-Khalil Hajati v. United States Postal Service

Filing 15

MINUTE (In Chambers): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 14 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: The Court granted Plaintiff Abdol-Khalil Hajati leave to amend the Complaint on or before 5/12/2017. As of 5/24/2017, no Complaint has been filed. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Court's April 25 Order, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. This Order shall constitute notice of entry of judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Pursuant to Local Rule 58-6, the Court ORDERS the Clerk to treat this order, and its entry on the docket, as an entry of judgment. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-6 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Case No. CV 17-00727 MWF (PJWx) Date: May 24, 2017 Title: Abdol-Khalil Hajati -v- United States Postal Service Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge Deputy Clerk: Rita Sanchez Court Reporter: Not Reported Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: None Present Attorneys Present for Defendant: None Present Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION [14] On April 25, 2017, the Court granted Defendant the United States Postal Service’s (the “Government”) Motion to Dismiss (the “April 25 Order”). (Docket No. 14). The Court granted Plaintiff Abdol-Khalil Hajati leave to amend the Complaint on or before May 12, 2017. (Id.). As of May 24, 2017, no Complaint has been filed. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Court’s April 25 Order, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. This Order shall constitute notice of entry of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Pursuant to Local Rule 58-6, the Court ORDERS the Clerk to treat this order, and its entry on the docket, as an entry of judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. ______________________________________________________________________________ CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?