Victorino Castillo v. Nuno D and T, Inc. et al

Filing 12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/14/2017. (rfi)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL Case No.: 2:17−cv−00746−BRO−AFM Title: VICTORINO CASTILLO V. NUNO D AND T, INC. ET AL Present: The Honorable Date: 5/24/2017 BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL Deputy Clerk: Renee Fisher Court Reporter/Recorder: None Tape No.: N/A Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: None Proceedings: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In this matter: Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint. Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiffs must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Initials of Deputy Clerk: rfi CV−90 (06/04) − CIVIL MINUTES−GENERAL − Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?