Sylvia Marie Alinei v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Filing
19
JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. The Court having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation ") 18 lod ged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. 17 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
SANDRA R. BROWN
Acting United States Attorney
DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE
JS-6
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, General Civil Section
STACY WIESBROCK, CSBN 257920
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
160 Spear St., Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 268-5612
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: stacy.wiesbrock@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
14
22
) No. 2:17-cv-00763-KS
)
) [PROPOSED]
Plaintiff,
) JUDGMENT OF REMAND
)
v.
)
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
)
)
Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant
23
to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation ”) lodged
24
concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is
26
remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with
27
the Stipulation to Remand.
28
DATED: May 25, 2017
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
SYLVIA ALINEI,
HON. KAREN L. STEVENSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?