Kaylynn Norwood v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 16

ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 15 . GOOD CAUSE APPEARING: 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Kaylynn Norwood dismisses all of the claims she has made against Defendan t Wal-Mart Store, Inc. in connection with the above-captioned matter with prejudice. 2. The above-caption action is therefore dismissed in its entirety. 3. Plaintiff and Defendant shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (smo)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 JAY S. ROTHMAN & ASSOCIATES Jay S. Rothman 21900 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 210 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Tel: (818) 986-7870 Fax: (818) 990-3019 lawyers@jayrothmanlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff KAYLYNN NORWOOD LTL ATTORNEYS LLP Patricia A. Kinaga (CA Bar No. 126845) patricia.kinaga@ltlattorneys.com Thy B. Bui (CA Bar No. 256383) thy.bui@ltlattorneys.com Lisa Yumi Mitchell (CA Bar No. 311407) lisayumi.mitchell@ltlattorneys.com 300 South Grand Avenue, 14th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: (213) 612-8900 Fax: (213) 612-3773 Attorneys for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA—WESTERN DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 KAYLYNN NORWOOD, an individual, CASE NO.: CV 17-783-GW(JCx) Assigned to the Hon. George H. Wu Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. Action Filed: January 3, 2017 Removal Date: January 31, 2017 Trial Date: January 16, 2018 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 2 3 4 ORDER Upon stipulation of Plaintiff KAYLYNN NORWOOD and Defendant WALMART STORES, INC. and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING: 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff 5 Kaylynn Norwood dismisses all of the claims she has made against 6 Defendant Wal-Mart Store, Inc. in connection with the above-captioned 7 matter with prejudice. 8 2. The above-caption action is therefore dismissed in its entirety. 9 3. Plaintiff and Defendant shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 DATED: August 24, 2017_____________ __________________________ GEORGE H. WU, U.S. District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?