Phoenix Fibers, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Filing
19
ORDER by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 18 . IT IS ORDERED granting the Stipulation that the above-captioned action is dismissed, with prejudice, each party bearing its own attorneys' fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (smo)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
David P. Bender, Jr./Bar No.123976
david.bender@haynesboone.com
Michael J. Stoner/Bar No. 269152
michael.stoner@haynesboone.com
Kenneth G. Parker/Bar No. 182911
kenneth.parker@haynesboone.com
Christopher B. Maciel/Bar No. 300733
chris.maciel@haynesboone.com
600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 700
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone: (949) 202-3000
Facsimile: (949) 202-3001
William C. O’Neill/Bar No. 251071
WCO@RossLLP.com
ROSS WERSCHING & WOLCOTT LLP
Attorneys at Law
3151 Airway Avenue, Building S-1
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Telephone: (714) 444-3900
Facsimile: (714) 444-3901
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PHOENIX FIBERS, INC.
14
15
UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT
16
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
17
18
19
PHOENIX FIBERS, INC., an
Arizona corporation,
Hon. Terry J. Hatter, Jr.
Plaintiff,
20
21
22
23
24
Case No. 2:17-cv-00791-TJH-JCx
[PROPOSED] ORDER
////////////////////
v.
EMPLOYERS MUTUAL
CASUALTY COMPANY, an Iowa
corporation; and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
25
Defendants.
26
27
28
16516125_1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
///////////////
[JS-6]
1
2
3
4
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated Dismissal with
Prejudice. Upon review by the Court, and pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation,
IT IS ORDERED granting the Stipulation that the above-captioned action
is dismissed, with prejudice, each party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
5
6
7
DATED:
September
15 , 2017
By:
8
Hon. Terry J. Hatter, Jr.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED]
//////////////// ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?